Just a day after
Tadej Pogacar claimed his first Critérium du Dauphiné title in commanding fashion, former world champion
Philippe Gilbert offered an unexpected and rather pointed criticism of the Slovenian.
Writing on his personal 'X' account, Gilbert accused Pogacar of showing a “lack of humility” and suggested he may have made “the first mistake of his career.”
“A few weeks before the Tour,” Gilbert wrote, “Tadej Pogacar may have made the first mistake of his career by showing a lack of humility towards his rivals, a mistake of youth that can be corrected, because I am sure that his natural character will soon return and with it his positive image.”
What’s striking, however, is that Gilbert didn’t specify what part of Pogacar’s behaviour was problematic. Was it his aggressive riding? His post-stage interviews? His dominance? His smile?
Let’s rewind. Pogacar lost time in the time trial, and went into the final mountain stages behind Jonas Vingegaard and Remco Evenepoel. He responded by attacking hard in both mountain finishes, putting time into both rivals and sealing the overall with three stage wins. Along the way, he chased down a dangerous move from Vingegaard on Stage 1 and outsprinted Mathieu van der Poel, something few riders are capable of. Was that disrespectful?
Was it a “lack of humility” to try and win a race?
Pogacar dominated the mountain stages of the Dauphine
Pogacar is often praised precisely because he doesn’t ride defensively. He races instinctively, attacks early, and embraces the responsibility of being a leader. If he had sat on Vingegaard’s wheel or soft-pedalled to avoid appearing too dominant, would that have been more acceptable?
Gilbert’s comment raises more questions than it answers. It is not clear what behaviour he disliked. There were no gestures of arrogance, no dismissive quotes, and no public criticisms of rivals. Pogacar’s only crime seems to have been that he won, comfortably, and didn’t apologise for it.
It’s also hard not to see the irony. Gilbert was himself a rider known for aggressive racing and seizing moments when they came. In his prime, he won by dropping rivals with sheer strength and style. If anything, Pogacar is a rider very much in Gilbert’s mould: bold, instinctive, and often better than everyone else.
And so, we’re left to wonder whether the real issue here is tone or timing. Is Pogacar being criticised for winning too much? For being open about his ambitions? For racing year round when others, like Vingegaard, are still cloaked in mystery?
This sort of communication can be taken offline. He has Tadej's contact. Tadej rode with his son. I don't see any instance where Tadej showed lack of humility. If he meant Tadej not going all out, then it's his perception. You know what I think is lack of humility? Delivering more crushing blow than necessary after your opponent is at his limit, like the way the German football team did to Brazil. It's good for spectators though. But, that's just my perception.
Obviously he needs attention (attention= clicks = money). Yes, he said that his son, secretly, whatsapped Tadej to ride together and the "arrogant" Tadej answered "yes, ok, not problem". Double traitor.
Liverpool came from 3 0 down to come back and beat AC Milan in a European Cup final. The idea Germany should have taken it easy against Brazil is ridiculous. This is supposed to be top level sport. And actually Germany did take it comparatively easy in the second half of that match. In that game, fantasy met reality and got woken up - and the fantasy was that Brazil didn’t see they were a seriously flawed side imagining they were virtually fated to triumph.
You don't have to be a fool to be an ex-pro-turned-commentator, but it seems to help.
Cyclists already don’t have many options, can’t all become DS (for which many aren’t gifted) or open bike shops,, it’s something fans of free sport have to accept as part of the deal. Besides, there’s really very little to report about cycling and its protagonists, what you see is what you get.
The best riders really just get on with their life after retirement. Take the example of Cav
Gilbert was an amazing racer, 4 of the 5 monuments, and that Ardenne triple in that miracle season of his. And yet, here's Pogacar who was one dumb sprint away from winning the triple this season, just like he was one dumb wrist injury away from doing it a few years ago. What did Pogacar do, to lead to these words? Perhaps it was that he simply defeated the Visma LAB team, and didn't even try to compete hard on the last climb of the race. He didn't give the satisfaction of racing hard, after racing hard. Perhaps that's it, a kind of humiliation while winning?
Good to know these guys always have a home on Cycling Up to date to whine and complain
Sadly, some people have a problem with greatness
Some people have a problem with greatness
When? How? where? The parallel world of acid oldies riders desperate for attention... These irresponsible hate mongers don't take into account that these boys are racing defenseless in the middle of the crowd. If some crazy person attack them I pretend these "experts" pay consequences.
Attacks have happened before, though the crouds are usually tame. There have been incidents of sprinters being pushed by spectators on the other side of the barriers. But it's on the climbs where riders are most vulnerable - they travel slowly (unless they're Pogi) and quite often isolated.
maybe he did not show humility at the attacks of Visma, laughing them off, seeing them as pathetic. But he is here to win, so does he need to show humility? Anyone of them will turn on the screws if he were in trouble. He is a winner and it is ok if he shows off as long as it is not egregious disrespect. But i would say that even that is ok since it creates polemics for the race that will be discussed long after.
I don’t know what he’s referring to specifically, if you really try to find something it might just be the way he eased off at the finish which some could interpret as trying to subtly convey a message like »hey guys, don’t bother coz I’m not even trying » I don’t think he would ever consciously think like that but there may be a past traumatised side of him that needs to prove superiority when it’s unnecessary, perhaps he was bullied at school, cyclists are often easy targets, frail and not socially comfortable.
just another bitter old jealous dude realizing Tadej will likely take something he didn’t - all 5 monuments.
Philippe Gilbert: "Who is this,
So tireless and swift in his ascent,
That looks not like th' inhabitants o' th' earth,
And yet is on't?"
I think Joshua Tarling and James Matthew Brennan actually have potential to win Paris-Roubaix