+0
09:58
09:50
01-10-2026 17:26
01-10-2026 17:25
01-10-2026 17:18
30-09-2026 17:28
+1
30-09-2026 16:03
30-09-2026 16:00
+7
30-09-2026 15:56
+5
28-09-2026 13:03
Loading
+0
Mistermaumau
Those are your prerogatives but just like you’ve disqualified me (and yet continue to engage), I disqualified her as interesting to me for having done what for me is unacceptable in her position (different e.g. to someone put in a position to feel they have no choice, so unless I discover something in the media about her having been blackmailed by her agent or employer I will stick to my position). I am also not interested in researching good things Hitler might have done or any talents he had as these claims rarely come from a source I could have respect for. Sorry to use an extreme to make a point but maybe you get it better put like that. Extremism/radicalism in any form can be acceptable or ok on an individual level (when it has no effect on outsiders) but NOT societally.09:58
+0
Mistermaumau
Pretty unclear what you are saying here, especially bringing skin colour into it for no apparent reason, but you do bring up an interesting issue although only from one point of view (father, not mother). So I ask you to think through this. I expect you’d be proud of your daughter/wife/sister if she’d tell you shéd made it « big » (obviously not if comparing to those with 1000s of x higher worth) financially (not a risky assumption based on the importance you’ve shown money has for you). Would you still be as proud to discover it was through showing herself naked publicly, for a betting company to attract male users easier? I expect many fathers (not averse to looking at naked females) will have a slightly different view on this than mothers but that this difference might drop when it concerns one of their own. Now, maybe in today’s morally confused and paradoxical society this might still be considered acceptable by some (let’s also not forget sole form of incest happens in 15-20% of families to remember how many weird men (and to a lesser degree women) there are, so in order for you to think this through properly and not through the societal pressure to conform to contemporary « normality « you might feel under lets skip the next message by directly considering the same question in the context of historical momentum. Would you have given the same answer in your grandparents’ time? Do you see how things have evolved since (regardless of whether we call that progress or not) even if it’s never linear (70’s being far less prudish than a few subsequent , depending on which generation you asked obviously). Now, fast forward another decade or generation or more of the same momentum and consider yourself a father when every young girl will see a financial opportunity to make it big through platforms like Onlyfans, Discord, Coco (and probably hundreds more unknown to mainstream media, worse even), you’d still be happy to defend your child for her choices, behaviour and the example she sets for others? Girls like this are just germinating and facilitating new Epsteins by lowering the barrier for (female, surprise, surprise) nudity.09:50
+0
Mistermaumau
And what America would be like without Europe?01-10-2026 17:26
+0
Mistermaumau
? There are many more billionaire Americans than Luxembourgers, yet the average Luxembourger is far richer than the average American, Cause/effect, numbers, proportions and many other variables make such statements pretty pointless, unless it’s to mislead.01-10-2026 17:25
+0
Mistermaumau
If you think he was nasty there, you obviously also didn’t pay attention to his behaviour outside the peleton either, can’t blame you but it was definitely easier to ignore him than the guy who should be wearing an orange jersey ;-)01-10-2026 17:18
+0
Mistermaumau
This is all very Hornery. The vast majority gave VDP little chance on this circuit that most said favoured the climbing duo. This was probably also quite a widespread theoretical calculation amongst riders and teams but the facts of racing are that each race is determined by how each rider reacts towards precalculated expectations until the scenario changes, and then, without radio and with so much chopping and changing, good luck to get any strategy going well before someone else messes yours up again. Sometimes it seems like some think riders have their strength on the day visible on their helmet so others can automatically know which is the best strategy to adopt to beat them.30-09-2026 17:28
+1
Mistermaumau
Seixas was already out of it when it came to serious business. If IDT didn’t enjoy his company, he had dozens of opportunities to join up with any number of chasers instead of focusing alone on PS. Something else was going on in his head.30-09-2026 16:03
+0
Mistermaumau
And this is all without considering how much outside influence riders are under. Money, institutions, politicians, betting syndicates, etc., can we be sure no-one is being suggested to do something they wouldn’t naturally have?30-09-2026 16:00
+7
Mistermaumau
It’s kind of ironic of MM to mention cross-border collaboration. For me, cross-border drafting comes quite close behind. Just relish your moment, maybe don’t suggest people should go looking into the mouth of the horse you were gifted.30-09-2026 15:56
+5
Mistermaumau
Totally agree, surprised he was still mixing it. Any idea how a DS would remind him or even notice without radios? Until what point did he have a teammate and when did he make his mistake? I’d like to know how much of a « disgrace » this really is.28-09-2026 13:03