+0
06-01-2026 18:11
+1
04-01-2026 15:05
03-01-2026 23:56
01-01-2026 21:17
01-01-2026 20:57
01-01-2026 20:52
01-01-2026 20:45
11-12-2025 07:31
09-12-2025 19:54
08-12-2025 23:18
Loading
+0
Mistermaumau
Any reason why the law should treat different categories of people differently? Don’t we have enough spite and discrimination already, including in justice systems?06-01-2026 18:11
+1
Mistermaumau
Quite a common thing in cycling no?04-01-2026 15:05
+0
Mistermaumau
I’m not sure I’d call taking advantage of unexpected situations tactics because if they don’t occur your tactic is useless. That said, I’m pretty sure, MVDP could have bridged across without Ganna too. I think Nibali’s analysis is completely irrelevant, the only deciding criteria under normal circumstances is topography, TP will usually win when there’s enough climbing and won’t when there isn’t. Both require a version of strength so no idea what he’s on about.03-01-2026 23:56
+0
Mistermaumau
This is the question everyone seems to want to answer. What’s strange is that NOBODY asks what would have happened if an earlier Tadej had been born around WWII and had to live like and with what was available back then, no money, no training camps, no svouts, no support, no security, no team. He probably wouldn’t even be cycling. Very hard to transpose anything in time. All of us who ride are faster than any of the first decades of Tour winners. As for those always claiming it was easier to dominate back in the day, there is this weird contradiction because if you look at sport in general and ask people to name the most dominant, it will just about always be « modern « day personalities. How come apart from maybe Ali, nobody was dominating other sports in the old days? PS Happy NY to all and a great season to all those who ride.01-01-2026 21:17
+0
Mistermaumau
Ce n’est pas le volume mais la qualité qui compte. Le cyclisme était un sport MAJEUR dans le passé, aujourd’hui presque niche. L’élite des 6 (une douzaine au moins en réalité) est tout à fait comparable à la masse globale minimale actuellement. En italie par ex. il y’a probablement plus de compétitivité aujourd’hui en tennis qu’en cyclisme.01-01-2026 20:57
+0
Mistermaumau
For Giro and possibly Lombardie, please do a background check on the likelihood of it having been doping or if it was the Italian version of a GT gut punch. Can’t opine about the 3rd.01-01-2026 20:52
+0
Mistermaumau
Maybe he hasn’t ;-)01-01-2026 20:45
+1
Mistermaumau
You’re saying 60% of riders and teams are whiners who don’t train or work? Just because they don’t have the right « sponsor »? Tell me how exactly a team that folds due to lack of sponsorship or riders that lose jobs because the big teams only need a certain number profits from anything? Do you think the sport would be more interesting if races only featured the 10-15 lucrative riders from 3 main teams? Would any football league be interesting if only big clubs played? You do realise in any race there can only be one winner right, so how do you justify spending money on ANY of the others in your logic? If you’re not prepared to pay the price of a participating field, any race or win becomes meaningless so now explain clearly, how would you define the criteria for anyone who wants to compete against the best? Are you suggesting unpaid amateurs have to go up against established pros fir as long as it takes to become good enough to find employment? That would be a GREAT way to reduce doping.11-12-2025 07:31
+0
Mistermaumau
Probably because hus instinctual reaction is no longer tuned to mountainbikes09-12-2025 19:54
+0
Mistermaumau
Interesting statement! You know, if Germany or the US would allow jews to have their country, I’m sure even such big A-holes as Hamas would find nothing against it. Don’t think you spelt out their objections quite as precise as called for. Also, when has any colonial power ever allowed the indigenous their own country without either a fight or loss of interest? You expect the indigenous to welcome imposed colonials in? And whilst we’re on the subject of distorted thinking, how come these right-wing neo-aryans in the UK calling for Christian values don’t realise their racial heritage isn’t Christianity at all and that many of those they oppose were Christian way before them. Can something spread by missionaries and « imposed » on their forefathers at a certain point in history really be your natural heritage? Choosing to rallye around Christianity nationally is like claiming a curry or pizza as national dish. As for their American counterparts, well, they should be even more confused considering the multitude of origins.08-12-2025 23:18