Ethics and Editorial Policy
CyclingUpToDate does not publish personal attacks against people and institutions in the cycling industry we cover, or against colleagues. We stress objectivity in reporting topics of a sensitive nature.
We abide by the most strict ethics principles journalists can adhere to.
Giving Credit and Acquiring Written Permission
Unless assets or news comes from official sources or their PR affiliates, we always provide link credit to original sources. We believe it is our responsibility to contribute to the online publishing ecosystem and best journalism practices. For images, non-official art, etc. we credit the artist and seek to contact them as well for permission to use their work.
Our Editorial policy
As the chief cycling expert editor of our esteemed news magazine, I am tasked with ensuring that our editorial policies not only meet but exceed the highest standards of integrity and credibility. In a world where misinformation can spread like wildfire, it is imperative that we uphold the principles set forth by the Ethical Journalism Network (EJN) and adhere to the Editorial Accuracy and Transparency (EAT) guidelines.
At the heart of our editorial policy lies a commitment to accuracy. We recognize the importance of providing our readers with reliable and fact-checked information. Every article that graces our pages undergoes a rigorous vetting process, where claims are verified, sources are cross-checked, and accuracy is paramount. We understand that even the smallest inaccuracies can erode trust, and therefore, we leave no stone unturned in our pursuit of the truth.
Transparency is another cornerstone of our editorial policy. We believe in being upfront and honest with our readers about our sources, affiliations, and potential biases. Any conflicts of interest are disclosed prominently, ensuring that our readers can make informed decisions about the information presented to them. Furthermore, we welcome feedback and corrections from our audience, acknowledging that transparency also means owning up to our mistakes and taking steps to rectify them.
In line with EAT guidelines, we are committed to providing diverse and balanced coverage of the cycling world. We recognize that our readers come from all walks of life and have varying interests and perspectives. As such, we strive to represent the full spectrum of the cycling community, from grassroots initiatives to professional tournaments, and from rising stars to seasoned veterans. By offering a comprehensive view of the cycling sport, we aim to foster a deeper understanding and appreciation among our readers.
For corrections or update requests, please contact via [email protected]
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He has already beaten Pogi twice in the TDF. the achievement is over. He cannot beat Pogi now and he only has a few years left at the top. Win Giro and compete in the TDF, maximise palmares.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- I think that they're not really used to dealing with this type of incident in a cyclocross race, and the situation has been magnified because it was a race for a championship title. It's very unfortunate that the race had to be decided in this way.
santiagobenites07-11-2026 - Seriously why do they keep doing stupid things like this. Its one thing to relegate when the placings are minor, when the action is blatant. But when it is ambiguous, why dont they at least take advice from some higher up to avoid embarrassing themselves. This is similar to the Halland goal when his teammate was clearly offside and interfered in play and VAR gave them the goal. if you dont have evidence you cannot convict. Even for doping they have these rulesabstractengineer07-11-2026
- So all those who went to watch, including all from abroad, waled there, spent nothing? Most places hosting events of the sort manage to make it worthwhile. If it was so obviously fruitless, don’t you think by now they’d have run out of hosting candidates? Why do you think the Tour can command such high prices for departure and arrival locations? If it didn’t bring anything locally they’d have to pay to get authorisation to use cities.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026





