Tadej Pogacar's purple shorts made illegal! Giro d'Italia leader threatened with disqualification

Cycling
Wednesday, 08 May 2024 at 09:45
tadejpogacar
Giro d'Italia organizers gave Tadej Pogacar shorts with a very noticeable colour on stage 3. After the UAE Team Emirates put on the pink jersey, he was also offered grenade-coloured shorts in tribute of the city of Torino and it's football team - in which many players passed away in 1949 on a plane crash. But the UCI was quick to ban this from happening in the space of only hours.
At the start of stage 4 Pogacar was back to black shorts, as expected taking into consideration his team's original attire. Yesterday's specific decision was explained by RCS Sport direction Paulo Bellino:
“We have made a change. Since this year we have made a Pink Jersey with grenade inserts, which recall the Grande Partenza on May 4th and there are various grenade inserts throughout the jersey, in my opinion, absolutely, as per the regulations," he told Eurosport.
"The colors match, because there are colors that recall. We therefore changed the bodysuit with grenade shorts that match the back where the 107 is and some internal colors. We did it with Castelli, who is our sponsor, who in my opinion did a wonderful job," he argued.
"It is clear that it is a little different from the past, but in my opinion, in Castelli's opinion, we are perfectly compliant with the regulation, which talks about harmonization and racing. And, in my opinion, the two colors match and harmonize together."
According to Cyclingnews not only was the equipment forbidden, but on Monday night UAE Team Emirates were warned not to use it, under the threat of disqualifying the race leader himself from the race.
claps 3visitors 3
23 Comments
Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3540

Safety of riders is a complex issue, this is not.

That’s why you get so many parking and speeding fines but very little dangerous driving is caught or punished.

That’s why you were sentenced to jail for stealing a chocolate bar on three different days in the US but could stay free forever stealing billions from millions or poisoning half the country.

Honestly, so what? Some here are hypocrites, making a second mountain out of the same mole hill.

abstractengineer 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3132

UCI- Always focusing on the little things that don't matter while ignoring the bigger things that matter

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3540

Just like any person would criticise for any large organisation.

Maybe because we ask too much when life is already fine?

If we all had more morals and discipline we would never really have needed a UCI, or governments or all those institutions that have the ungrateful job of deciding what’s best for everyone when everyone wants something slightly different.

User Avatar
PAULO 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 344

UAE don't wear Castelli.. Was given from the organization. How he would be disqualified? UCI at their best

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3540

Very simple, both riders are organisers are members of the UCI and therefor 1. are supposed to abide by the governing rules, 2 are free to contest them or 3 risk a penalty for transgression.

I don’t see why each time there is an unpopular decision everyone makes a fuss for nothing, spend your time and efforts changing things that aren’t good, not complaining about it pointlessly.

So far, NO-ONE has even explained exactly what the rule says and why it was or wasn’t transgressed or shown an argument for or against.

Sometimes I wonder about the lack of logic in systematic thinking (and I certainly don’t consider myself a genius).

To take a simple case, the US is spending years and millions to decide whether Trump has (had, actually) what is basically total presidential immunity by resorting to ever more complex testing and discussion of law and constitutional wording. For what, in order for people to remain camped on 2 sides forever?

Instead, look at things in their most basic form and ask yourself if Trump would be accorded total immunity, that would mean ANY president could (have) claim(ed) the same.

Implications:

Biden will be able to prevent a change of power if he loses.

A past losing president will claim HIS election was stolen

There would be no need for elections ever again unless a president died or quit of his own will.

End of democracy, total dictatorship and anarchy.

So, next question to ask Trump, if he thought it was legitimate to claim a stolen election and block the change of power, will he allow the same this autumn in case Biden decides to test Trump logic?

No, I think he will continue the hypocrisy like expecting everyone to continue to pay taxes as long as he doesn’t have to.

User Avatar
PAULO 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 344

Got Mushrooms?

frieders3 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 1254

Thankfully as those shorts should be black ! Now go enforce the sock and shifter angle rules !

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3540

You know, the UCI is like any other authority we allow to enforce and implement rules.

The rules are set, if you don’t adhere you risk penalties, if you don’t like the rules, you are free to apply pressure (with others helps) to ask for change so you can do what you wanted after the rules change.

If you’re not sure, you ask in advance. If you don’t bother and want to try something new or doubtful, you do so knowing the risks.

If things become flexible it only invites more testing of rules, more arguing about why certain rules are treated differently and most importantly, what none of us except maybe the UCI wants, a need for far more staff (so expenses) to deal with all the issues.

What’s so difficult about accepting the least bad solution to an unsolvable one?

You may think (hope or convince/delude yourself) you are doing something within the rules, but if you haven’t checked carefully, you’re not the right person to judge.

A lot of people think they are within the rules if they cross a red light to make space for police or ambulances. It may seem like a stupid rule (until something goes wrong) but no-one does anything about changing it.

acem82 08 May 2024 at 10:37+ 555

The UCI banning fairings, recumbents, and anything other than a double triangle upright bike, is the reason why we don't have cheap, mass produced stupid fast bikes that are almost weatherproof.
They are control-freaks. They deserve to be laughed at and restricted to the dust bin of history.
Humans can make their own risk assessments and (I don't know why I have to say this) their own clothing choices!

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3540

Wrong, the reason they are not mass produced is because the public has taken an aversion to cycling since cars dominated the world. You can offer free e-bikes and the vast majority still won’t use them to go to work or shops. That whole question has NOTHING to do with the UCI just like F1 banning jewellery doesn’t stop women doing their make-up in the car mirror.

Humans are notoriously bad at making risk assessments hence the degradation in health and longevity in many developed countries due to inability to assess risks from tobacco, alcohol, drugs, pcbs, asbestos, pfas, nanoplastics and dozens more ubiquitous products.

They are no more control-freaks than parents towards children, governments towards society or industry towards customers.

But yes make your risk assessment and get disqualified. You come to my house you play by my rules, don’t like it go somewhere else or convince me to change. Don’t waste your breath here, if even you won’t make the effort to lobby them, no-one is going to join you.

acem82 08 June 2024 at 21:42+ 555

If your claim were true, then 2 triangle upright bikes wouldn't be $400!
Also, compulsory helmet laws hurting cycling (and health), and would likely be less necessary in a full fairing bike.
The UCI isn't regulating children!
Governments are the ultimate control-freaks!
Cycling isn't the UCI's house, they didn't build it. I race, but I haven't raced a UCI event in years, not just due to cost and incompetence, but due to their stupid rules.
I can see that the concept of "emergent order" isn't taught in government schools. Too bad they specifically avoid teaching that ...it would be bad for their power, after all.

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:53+ 3540

Jeez, mixing up and supposing a lot of things out of anger and frustration.

The cycling industry is, as you say almost completely independent of the UCI, they are free to engage with buyers as they want and buyers can boycott or grab the products they want, popular products will always end up getting mass produced,

Bmw (amongst others) made a motorbike with seatbelt and rainroof for a while with no helmet obligation, it was kind of popular, for a niche for about 5 years. You don’t see ANY anymore, or spin-offs or copies or improvements. Not enough people want the same as you, accept it because you are starting to sound like a control freak, trying to impose on industry and the UCI to adapt to YOU.

The whole reason we have governments is because no-one wants to grant their bad neighbour or enemy control over their life, then rather a supposedly neutral party without real conflicts of interest.

The people against governments never have better alternatives and never remember how much in life is due to the collective. Hardly anything would have come into existence if mankind had developed with total freedom for each individual, in fact we’d probably have all killed each other a long time ago.

acem82 10 May 2024 at 17:24+ 555

Yes, the industry can do what they want, but the UCI controls most professional cycling, and therefore what the industry advertises. People want what professionals ride, not what is actually fast.
The motorbike didn't reflect any real advantage, save gas mileage. It couldn't go any faster (legally) than anything already out there. Therefore, this isn't a good analogy.
I don't want the UCI to adapt to me. I want the organization to cease existing. It makes cycling more expensive and destroys innovation. It's best replaced by nothing at all.
The reason we have governments (the State) is because cartels realized it was easier to pretend to "serve" and "protect" people than to make it obvious that they are robbing us. It makes us more likely to submit. Do you honestly think that the State is neutral and has no conflicts of interest? Open your eyes!
And there are governments that aren't States, things that demand a monopoly on the use of violence and tax. But control-freaks like States because they have ultimate control of our lives, and States lie that they are necessary.
And you believe them!

acem82 18 May 2024 at 13:33+ 555

And, for anyone interested on if a State is necessary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ0Qkhnt6bQ&t=71s

mobk 08 May 2024 at 20:24+ 1614

I am glad to see the UCI focus on the big picture. Wouldn't want them to get distracted with irrelevant issues like rider safety.

User Avatar
StardustDragon 08 June 2024 at 21:55+ 1653

What?

User Avatar
santiagobenites 08 June 2024 at 21:55+ 1754

I don't know why he's wearing purple shorts with the pink jersey anyhow (it's not a great look), but threatening to disqualify him from the Giro for it is a little heavy handed indeed. Just talk to him or his team discreetly, UCI, and don't make yourself look even worse than you already do.

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:55+ 3540

Why should the UCI be different than any other sporting federation? Uniforms, when specified are always considered strictly.

Even if you wear an out of date club uniform you risk disqualification

acem82 08 May 2024 at 05:05+ 555

Or, maybe just don't be control-freaks?

Mistermaumau 08 June 2024 at 21:55+ 3540

Easy to say when you have no responsibility for the consequences. You know exactly how it goes, give a little finger and soon someone is taking an arm. That’s the whole point about rules, if everyone follows the current ones there is never an issue. No-one has ever said change can’t be discussed, but then ask!

acem82 08 May 2024 at 10:40+ 555

Oh, no! The terrible consequences of purple shorts with a pink jersey! I'm sure people are dying in the streets right now and only the UCI can possibly save us from this!
I'm so glad that UCI races are dying off in the US ...while non-UCI races are flourishing!

User Avatar
StardustDragon 08 June 2024 at 21:54+ 1653

I wonder about that too. That sounds silly

roadman54121 08 June 2024 at 21:43+ 418

The UCI are desperately trying to dehumize this sport.

Just in

Popular news