+0
21:00
20:59
+8
10-10-2026 13:48
+4
28-09-2026 22:45
+1
28-09-2026 02:48
+9
28-09-2026 02:46
27-09-2026 21:41
+3
21-09-2026 22:27
+6
12-09-2026 14:12
12-09-2026 04:19
Loading
+0
acem82
That used to be the norm, 100 kms of TTs. Now look at the '87 route...21:00
+0
acem82
Well, crashes can happen, so it's not impossible...20:59
+8
acem82
This! This is is how the riders get the UCI (and races) to pay attention! -An Economist10-10-2026 13:48
+4
acem82
He was doing his pulls, and even "attacking" a few times.28-09-2026 22:45
+1
acem82
They don't want to drag Jorgenson up to him.28-09-2026 02:48
+9
acem82
Simmons was a beast as well, the only one to go pedal for pedal with MVP during his attack.28-09-2026 02:46
+0
acem82
Ban the UCI, let the race organizers figure it out. The market works, so let it. What won't works will fail, what will work will succeed. -An Economist27-09-2026 21:41
+3
acem82
MVDP doing MVDP things.21-09-2026 22:27
+6
acem82
I'm not going to be impressed until he wins one in Antarctica...12-09-2026 14:12
+0
acem82
My knowledge of boxing is limited, and likely 20 years out of date. Suffice to say, assuming there's no fraud (not sure that's a good assumption), then the boxers tend to be paid what they're worth. A famous fighter goes up against an unknown, the famous fighter makes much more out of the fight, as he's the reason the fight makes most of the money it made. Honestly, the various states (American meaning or worldwide meaning of the term) making rules about the rules and legality of professional martial arts means there is an oligopoly in them, so the fighters will get paid less and the organizations get paid more. Big government benefits oligopolies and monopolies, regardless of what anyone might want.12-09-2026 04:19