"I've read some comments about ASO or the Tour, which are the same thing, claiming they are trying to test Pogagar with the route. We've heard that every year, after a few Tour's look at this design goes against such a Pogacar or against Armstrong. None of that crap matters," he argues. "I always joked that if they ever decided to do 22 criteriums around Paris we'd have to figure out how to win. There can't be anything against, if you're Pogacar you have to study how to do it, that conversation is meaningless, the best cyclists are prepared for the routes. It's the Tour and 99 times out of 100 the best wins."
The route features less high mountain than the more modern Tour routes, but in reality the World Champion has shown no weakness this season and no terrain where his main rivals were above him, rendering the argument almost unviable. .Johan Bruyneel, Lance Armstrong's former sports director and a regular contributor to The Move, described the 2025 route as "traditional":
"I think the main novelty of the 2025 Tour de France is the return to a traditional route. in the first week it's not hard, the first mountain stage doesn't come until the 12th, that's too late and that's going back to the old days."
On the discussion of whether Vingegaard or Pogacar is better suited, Bruyneel is clear: "The best rider with the best team always wins the Tour de France without bad luck". He continues: "In terms of elevation gain, it's more or less the same as this year's. I like the design. I like the design".
George Hincapie, a former colleague of the two at US Postal, speaks of safety as a factor to be taken into account because of the change in the type of course: "In recent years there has been a fight for the overall from the first days, now there is not, which will make the race safer in the early stages, with the riders thinking about getting to the finish line".