“It is clear that he wants to go to the Tour de France" - Is Olav Kooij looking for a way out of Team Visma | Lease a Bike?
Cycling
As one of the most promising young sprinters in the peloton,
Olav Kooij’s future is now a topic of growing interest. The 23-year-old
Dutchman’s contract with Team Visma | Lease a Bike expires at the end of this
season, and questions are swirling about whether he will continue with the
Dutch team, or seek new opportunities elsewhere.
While the team continues to be shaped around Jonas
Vingegaard’s Grand Tour aspirations and Wout van Aert’s classics ambitions,
Kooij (who has delivered consistently in sprint finishes) has his sights set
higher. According to Grischa Niermann, a key figure in Visma’s management team,
the decision on Kooij’s future is still very much up in the air.
“No, because we are still in talks with him and his
managers. That can go both ways. Of course we are negotiating with Olav about a
contract extension, but also about his sporting ambitions and possibilities,”
Niermann told Wielerflits when asked whether Kooij might leave the team.
A major factor in those discussions? The Tour de France.
“It is clear that he wants to go to the Tour de France,”
Niermann acknowledged. “We have to see if that fits into our schedule for the
coming years. We are talking about that. We will see what comes of it.”
With Vingegaard targeting overall victory and van Aert
likely to hunt stages or support roles, the team must carefully assess whether
there’s space in their Tour de France line-up for a pure sprinter like Kooij.
Balancing these goals is no easy task for a squad that has championship
pedigree across multiple terrains.
Niermann didn’t hint at a looming decision, but admitted
there is a practical timeline, “There is no deadline,” he said. “But at a
certain point you have to move on. That also applies to Olav. We still have
some time. Officially, the deadline is August 1. Let's wait and see.”
In the meantime, the dynamics within Visma’s sprinting
roster are evolving rapidly. This week, Matthew Brennan, the sensational
19-year-old Brit, lit up the headlines with his breakthrough performances. He’s
another sprinter rising through the Visma ranks, and complicating Kooij’s
potential role within the team moving forward.
“The best scenario for our team is that you have five or six
riders who win ten times a year,” Niermann said. “That is also what we are
going for, what we strive for. But you also have to have a balance in your
team, also a balance in terms of opportunities. We have our ideas about that
and we make decisions based on that. And sometimes you have to accept that riders
see it differently.”
That sentiment highlights the delicate juggling act facing
top-tier teams like Visma. There is only so much room in the calendar (and the
Tour squad) for multiple ambitions to coexist. As riders like Brennan rise,
others, including Kooij, must assess whether their trajectory is best served by
staying or moving on.
Kooij’s week on the road, meanwhile, has been frustrating.
At Classic Brugge–De Panne, a race tailor made for sprinters, he was one of the
pre-race favourites. But like many others, he was taken out of contention by
the chaotic crashes that plagued the final kilometres. He never got the chance
to sprint.
“Unfortunately, Olav also fell, but the damage seems to be
limited to abrasions,” Niermann said after the race. “He still has some big
goals coming up, so we'll have to wait and see how he copes with this crash.”
Visma had been well positioned heading into the finale, but
the dangerous layout of the finish, riddled with road narrowing’s and sudden
bends, once again sparked criticism from riders and teams.
“We were where we needed to be as a team, but a crash was
inevitable. The finale was simply too dangerous today. The road narrowing in the final kilometres caused some risky
situations,” Niermann said.
As Kooij recovers from his fall and the season rolls on, the
focus will shift back to where he best fits in the long-term picture, both
within Team Visma and the broader sprinting landscape. He’s still young, highly
talented, and ambitious enough to want a spot on the sport’s biggest stage.
The decision ahead is not only about contracts, it’s also about
career trajectory, team dynamics, and opportunity. With teams needing to
balance Grand Tour contenders, sprinters, and rising stars, Visma faces one of
its tougher internal calls this season.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment