Team Visma | Lease a Bike

Latest comments

• mobk11-12-2025
  Won three of the big one week tours in a row this year. Pretty impressive. I don't think he had much of a chance against Jonas in the Vuelta, but would have been nice to see him getting better support from the team.
• mobk11-12-2025
  I don't think he's quite over the hill at 25 years old
• abstractengineer11-12-2025
  These Belgian Commentators are really something. First Jonas should participate in Spring classics. He is a coward if he does not do so. Now it is Remco should save himself for the TDF becoz Jonas is doing so.
• 

  maria2024202411-12-2025
  😂😂😂
• awp11-12-2025
  He has the physical side of it, but he needs the mental as well, I think that is where he's lacking, he's still developing and I figure he'll have a breakout year within the next two or he never will. The mental side of cycling is intense.
• MajorPayne11-12-2025
  Remco will never win a grand tour again! I hope and wish him that Rogla will manage to win the Vuelta.
• 

  KerisVroom11-12-2025
  Of course, he had to pay extra. His perpetually protruding hair betrays the stiffness of his hair. It probably blunted the barber's scissors in no time, so he had to pay extra to compensate.
• 

  leedorney11-12-2025
  Roglic, one of the most interesting people to read/listen to in an interview and figure out what he's saying/meaning...
• abstractengineer11-12-2025
  The distribution is reasonably good but i wonder how many are pleased, certainly not Remco or Roglic
• Mistermaumau11-12-2025
  You’re saying 60% of riders and teams are whiners who don’t train or work? Just because they don’t have the right « sponsor »? Tell me how exactly a team that folds due to lack of sponsorship or riders that lose jobs because the big teams only need a certain number profits from anything? Do you think the sport would be more interesting if races only featured the 10-15 lucrative riders from 3 main teams? Would any football league be interesting if only big clubs played? You do realise in any race there can only be one winner right, so how do you justify spending money on ANY of the others in your logic? If you’re not prepared to pay the price of a participating field, any race or win becomes meaningless so now explain clearly, how would you define the criteria for anyone who wants to compete against the best? Are you suggesting unpaid amateurs have to go up against established pros fir as long as it takes to become good enough to find employment? That would be a GREAT way to reduce doping.