Han Kock questions van Baarle's condition ahead of Paris-Roubaix - "It is a big question mark how good he is"
Cycling
Dylan van Baarle confronts a daunting responsibility in Paris-Roubaix as he endeavours to satisfy the anticipated outcome of his title defence and simultaneously fulfil the significant task of being a valuable aide to his team leader, Wout van Aert.
"Dylan hopes he will be good, but there is a big question mark behind his condition," questioned NOS journalist Han Kock. Judging by the statistics, his spring began promisingly with a victory in the Omloop Het Nieuwsblad, although his performance was modest in Kuurne - Bruxelles - Kuurne, and Tirreno-Adriatico was a letdown.
Read also
Owing to his injury in the E3 Saxo Classic and the serious stomach and intestinal complications that surfaced just before the Tour of Flanders, his health status is enigmatic to outsiders. "So it is a big question mark how good he is," Kock once again focuses on this point.
He further added, “Yesterday, I spoke to Dylan after his Paris-Roubaix recon, and he said he had a tough week. In the week before the Tour of Flanders, he says he only sat on the pot. Dylan was so ill that he didn't regret for a second that he couldn't be there in the Tour."
Read also
Baarle was able to make a recovery in time for the main event and even managed to allocate some time for training to improve his preparation. "After his illness, he was able to complete some good training sessions there. After the Roubaix reconnaissance with the team, Van Baarle trained for another 2 hours. He hopes he will be good on Sunday, but of course, I can't look into his body. He is happy that the weather will be nice on Sunday and that the cobblestones will dry up as a result,” concluded Kock.
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









