🇫🇷 #TDF2024 💬 “Unfortunately we couldn't join the leading group, but I enjoyed this stage.” - Bart Lemmen Read more from Bart and Wout van Aert in our report! ✍️
Bart Lemmen disappointed Wout van Aert didn't get a shot a stage win: "In case of a small group sprint, Wout wins in eighty percent of the cases. The tactic was clear"
CyclingFriday, 19 July 2024 at 02:30
Bart Lemmen was very impressive throughout the eighteenth stage of Tour de France. The Dutchman ultimately only cruised across the line in Barcelonnette as sixth, however whole Visma | Lease a Bike hoped to pull the Wout Van Aert card in the final. If only the Belgian wasn't stuck in the third group on the road.
Speaking his own performance, Lemmen can be quite happy with his day, however the icing on the cake is missing. "Ultimately you race to win," Lemmen said at WielerFlits. "The way I rode was good I think, just like my legs. But this wasn’t the result we came for."
"We rode away on the first climb," he refers to himself and Wout van Aert in an interview for Eurosport. "We got into a very large group. After that we rode quite calmly until I think the penultimate climb, where the race exploded."
Read also
Lemmen put himself at Van Aert's service in the run-up towards the stage's final. He responded to numerous attacks and then kept his legs still. In the end, however, he ended up in a group that had started the chase on the leaders and so he was stuck between two groups. "My legs were pretty empty at the end. I could no longer do the work I wanted to do."
At NOS, Lemmen said that he and Van Aert hoped that it would eventually come to a sprint. "I think that would normally have happened, but those three rode away on the descent. I didn't brake there either and yet those guys pulled away. That's because that motorcycle is in front of them," he believes. "That's just annoying. If a motorcycle is twenty meters in front of it, you don't ride 80, but 85. Then you just ride away."
Lemmen doesn't know if he had the legs to win today. "I was really good. Can I win? Yes, definitely, but then it has to be very specific. But if you arrive here with Wout with five, six, twenty or maybe even fifty men, he wins in eighty percent of the cases. That was completely the tactic."
Read also
claps 0visitors 1809
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Froome wishing to ride the Vuelta...he won't even be selected for the team!frieders320-12-2024
- Keep telling yourself that Remco but you not only have Tadeg to beat but Jonas!frieders320-12-2024
- Seems farfetched - I agree. Mas has beaten him once. Giro d'Emillia I think - 2022mobk20-12-2024
- Barring injuries, by the time Pogacar's dominance fads there will be lots of new young talent. Pogacar is about 1 1/2 years older than Remco. That's nothing.Sweep20-12-2024
- I actually don’t find that too impressive. In my later forties I did similar figures for a 3.5% gradient as a total nobody with no wind assistance. Am sure there’s margin for improvement there, especially looking at all the names on that list.Mistermaumau20-12-2024
- Jonas', was 6 years agospock12320-12-2024
- The race where he overnight suddenly turned nuclear after being packfodder at best for several years. His Sky days after that Vuelta and Pogačar’s last season shall remain the darkest post Lance stuff cycling has witnessed. Good riddance Froome.
UltimateOpportunist20-12-2024 - Finishing the Vuelta seems to be a reasonably attainable goal. Getting on the team to do that will be the more difficult challenge.
santiagobenites20-12-2024 - To be fair, he has now stated his fuel regime had been corrected and the results concur.Mistermaumau20-12-2024
- You can look at things mathematically sometimes to get a better understanding of performance distribution. To be an elite cyclist you may need a number of qualities, say 8 some of which are quite obvious (engine), some more debatable (body type). If you look at distribution you’ll get a whole bunch with 6 or 7 very elevated values but 1-2 not so perfect and occasionally someone will pop up with all 8 really well developed. However, statistically, for that to be a given the chances drop by about an order of magnitude each time so in general for each 2 at the top you’ll have 20 at the next level, 200 at tge 3rd, 2000, etc. I don’t see the actual distribution as so weird, we have a few too many right at the very top level but statistically it’s just because for the past 15-20 years there wasn’t really anyone clearly standing out, level 1 was bunched with level two.Mistermaumau20-12-2024