UCI announce plans "to carry out an in-depth analysis of the regulations" amidst time-trial helmet controversy

How far is too far when it comes to developing the most aerodynamic time-trial helmets? This question is a hot-topic in the cycling world at the moment and because of this, the UCI are about to analyse their rules around the issue.

"The constant quest for improved performance and ever-increasing attention given to detail is leading professional teams and equipment manufacturers to develop their equipment more often and with ever more radical designs. The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) today wishes to clarify its position concerning the category of helmet," reads an official statement by the UCI.

Read also

"It’s a good moment to stop cycling" - Thomas De Gendt not a fan of controversial new Visma time-trial helmets

"Firstly, the UCI recently informed Specialized of a review it had conducted on the head sock component of the American company’s TT5 helmet. This review was carried out to determine whether the helmet was in line with article 1.3.033 of the UCI Regulations, which prohibits the use of “non-essential” components that are not exclusively for clothing or safety purposes. After conducting a thorough process, which included consultation with Specialized, as well as examination of documentation linked to the helmet’s certification, safety instructions, and information from public sources, it was concluded that the head sock is a “non-essential” component (article 1.3.033 of the UCI Regulations). As a result, the head sock integrated into the TT5 helmet will no longer be permitted for use at events on the UCI International Calendar, effective from 2 April, 2024," the statement says.

Teams such as Bahrain - Victorious and Team Visma | Lease a Bike unveiled new helmets in recent days with Visma's especially catching the attention of the cycling world and not necessarily in a positive way. "Regarding the helmet manufactured by Giro Sport Design, which was used by Team Visma|Lease a Bike at the Tirreno-Adriatico prologue, as well as the Rudy Project Windgream HL 85 helmet (used by Bahrain Victorious) and Poc Tempor helmet (used by several teams), the UCI acknowledges that while this may not directly contravene existing UCI Regulations, it raises a significant issue concerning the current and wider trend in time trial helmet design, which focuses more on performance than the primary function of a helmet, namely to ensure the safety of the wearer in the event of a fall," the UCI says.

"In view of the evolution of these situations as well as other problems encountered in recent years, in relation to the requirement for commercial availability, the ban on non-essential components and the shape and size of time trial helmets, the UCI will undertake a review of its rules on the design and use of helmets in competition. By doing so, it wishes to ensure that they set a clear framework that is consistent with the objectives targeted. Any modification to these rules will be communicated rapidly after its adoption by the competent UCI bodies."

Read also

"I think it will be the future" - Jonas Vingegaard's opinion on Team Visma's new time-trial helmet

UCI_media

@UCI_media

·Follow

The UCI to carry out an in-depth analysis of the regulations governing the design and use of time trial helmets bit.ly/3TmQGIs

334

Reply

Copy link

Read 32 replies