
Even though Ellen van Dijk is currently away from the peloton, taking time off for maternity leave, she still manages to make headlines, not for her own achievements, but for her opinionated remarks about Cecilie Uttrup Ludwig.
Van Dijk and Roxane Knetemann, who co-hosts the cycling podcast Wegkletsen, recently discussed the Danish rider, with van Dijk expressing criticism during the episode. “I find her such an annoying rider. She's always yelling and whining. I was good at that myself, but with her there is always such a fuss about it,” Knetemann said about Ludwig.
Read also
Van Dijk added, “She is a rider who never catches a breath of wind, she is always in the wheel, always waiting. People think she's fantastic in the media, but with the riders… Nobody likes her.”
As a popular sports personality in her country with a magnetic personality, Ludwig's fans were quick to come to her defence after van Dijk's comments. Recognising her mistake, van Dijk apologized for her behaviour during the latest episode of her podcast.
Read also
"I have received a lot of negative feedback from Denmark and I must say that I understand the anger of these people. I think I went too far and said things I shouldn't have said. I regret all that and I want to say undskyld," said the Dutchwoman.
She also informed this is not something Ludwig is not aware of, “She knows very well that I am not a fan of her as a runner, we regularly fight during the races," concluded van Dijk.
Read also
claps 3visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments








