Dutch pundit criticizes 'amateurish' retirement spectacle for Mark Cavendish in Singapore: "One last cash in a fake race on the other side of the world"

The Tour de France-organized criteriums are by all means 'scripted'. The results are planned beforehand, not with the intent of fooling the audience, but instead of giving the big stars and the events more spectacle. They are races that divide public opinion quite a bit, and Thijs Zonneveld directly criticizes how Mark Cavendish's final race lacked authenticity, whereas he could've retired in the race that marked his career: the Tour de France.

"Mark Cavendish, the best sprinter of all time, said goodbye to cycling last weekend. He had chosen - wait, let me check - the Tour de France Prudential Singapore Criterium for this purpose. But no matter how hard he (along with a few fellow sprinters) tried to make it look epic, iconic, and historic, it didn't work," Zonneveld said in a column for AD. As was the case with the Saitama Criterium the week prior, it was evident that the riders followed a plan to allow Cavendish to win his 'final race'.

Read also

Mark Cavendish will fully devote himself to cycling, despite winning retirement at Singapore Criterium: "That will not stop, not even now that my cycling career has ended"

Whilst it won't appear on the results sheet of any results website - it's not an official race - this event is ultimately called the final race of the 'Manx Missile's' career. Cavendish won, after decade and a half of pursuit and years of roller-coaster emotions in the 2020's, his 35th win at the Tour de France. And he managed to survive the mountains to make it to Nice. In Zonneveld's opinion, that would've been the ideal place to finish his career, as he was even honoured on the podium at the end of the race.

Instead, after months of indecision and no racing, it was only this Saturday that the Astana Qazaqstan Team announced that he would be retiring and his final event would be in Singapore the day after. Naturally, he was given the spotlight and won the sprint in the race. "Even in the interview afterward, in which he tried to sound emotional, you got the feeling you were watching an amateurish constructed scene," Zonnveld argues. "In almost every pro criterium, the outcome is predetermined. The biggest (and most expensive) names are on the podium; the others are decor."

Read also

Johan Bruyneel explodes against 'complete bullsh*t' Remco Evenepoel rumour - "I don't know anybody in their right mind who would pay 10 million to a rider"

"Of course, it would have been best if he had said goodbye on the evening of his 35th stage victory in the Tour. On the spot, from behind a Formica table of a French hotel. Had we all remembered him forever? He could also have stopped after the last Tour stage in Nice," he argues. On Sunday, social media was rather flooded by sarcastic comments on the results and criticism on the 'planning' of race results, which were argued to be a cheap way to end such a bright legacy.

"... Instead, he sold his farewell. One last cash in a fake race on the other side of the world, like Elvis making one last Tour past shady casinos in Las Vegas before his body gave out. But in a way, it also suits Cavendish. He has so many faces. That of an unstoppable champion, but also that of a kamikaze," he concluded.

Read also

Mark Cavendish's retirement marks the end of an era for pure sprinters according to Renaat Schotte: "He himself has said that he is a sprinter of a dying breed"