+0
02:07
+5
18-12-2025 23:03
+2
02-12-2025 09:58
09-11-2025 14:38
31-10-2025 09:40
23-10-2025 03:50
21-10-2025 09:09
22-09-2025 05:33
13-08-2025 05:32
+43
08-08-2025 18:18
Loading
+0
itsent
The distinction one could draw is, Hincapie did not deny his doping; he admitted it prior to even being publicly accused. And, unlike his more famous friend, he did not defend a supposed innocence or behave aggressively against others, nor detrimentally steamroll them in the course of self-defense. No, he copped to it for a deal, served the time, and slowly returned to a public presence. It may not be possible to be a fan of a pro cycling doper profiting from breaking the rules, but as with anything or any personality of which people choose to be fans, we also choose which things to stand firm against or to forgive. For a person re-entering their chosen field after doing the work of accepting punishment and rebuilding a public-facing team in a hopefully honorable way, well, this can be accepted. From there, you can forgive yourself for accepting them and add overtly positive comments instead of harsh judgment-based criticisms, which feel better for the self and others.02:07
+5
itsent
Dear Editor: It is no humiliation to make the final, even with two riders, and not get it perfect against another talented rider. Disappointment, sure.18-12-2025 23:03
+2
itsent
Teams and riders should get real regarding team budgets. A €50m (or €1m for that matter) budget is not a "sponsorship", it is marketing, plain and simple. Presenting the marketing value to companies, rather than a sponsorship proposal, could in and of itself see teams taken more seriously while eliminating the fragility factor. Companies own teams to market their brands in other professional sports. On the other hand, little league teams get sponsorship to pay for their uniforms and equipment. Why are professional cycling teams still using the little league approach to funding their teams? Then, Mr van Aert seems, in some measure, to lack cognizance of the privilege of race organizers paying to have roads closed so he can race on them in the course of earning his salary. It may seem like a small thing to have a paid VIP section, but adding this would only be the first in a series of such measures at the top of a slippery slope.02-12-2025 09:58
+2
itsent
Go greed! There are numerous ways to improve the sport's profits (and team budgets) that do not include charging admission for people to stand on the road they likely in part paid for. Eschewing these in favor of stripping people's rights for the purpose of funding race budgets cannot be much else than laziness or greed.09-11-2025 14:38
+2
itsent
Always enjoy Rowe's dialog. Dopers suck, but bullies suck too. There's probably a better way.31-10-2025 09:40
+2
itsent
Article from the dept of who cares? It's entertainment. These guys are both fun to watch.23-10-2025 03:50
+2
itsent
Vincenzo Nibali regarded Horner as not only one of the best climbers in the peloton, but as a worthy competitor who produced a superior performance in that Vuelta.21-10-2025 09:09
+0
itsent
This appears to be a double-decker generalization about Americans and certainly not an accurate one.22-09-2025 05:33
+0
itsent
This is perhaps the most cleverly-worded headline this site has ever keyed.13-08-2025 05:32
+43
itsent
Counterpoint: At age 19, I was 5'10" and 112 lbs, racing. Ms. Vollering is addressing young people. Her words here do not sound anything like a complaint. Rather, they are clearly about health and self-empowerment through health. I am even more of a fan now.08-08-2025 18:18