“We don’t want you here anymore” – Tour de France organisers threaten action against beloved PCS camper
Cycling
The beloved Pro Cycling Stats campervan has become a staple
of the Tour de France summer scene, parked among fans and handing out coffee to
journalists, riders, and even the occasional race organiser. But this year,
that quiet presence has drawn the ire of race owners ASO, who have threatened
PCS with legal action.
According to a statement issued by PCS before the race
began, “ASO more or less forced us to hide our PCS branding during every stage,
from publicity caravan to broom wagon. We’ve become less visible, almost
invisible.”
Still, they haven’t left. “Yet we’re still there, parked
among the fans, cheering every stage, even if it feels like we’re fading into
the background,” the statement continued. “If you do spot us, please come say
hi. Whether you’re a fan, journalist, team director, or even an ASO staffer,
there’s always a cup of coffee waiting at the camper.”
The situation escalated behind the scenes in early June,
when ASO sent an email to PCS CEO Stephan van der Zwan. According to BikeRadar,
the message made it clear: ASO considers itself the “exclusive owner of the
exploitation rights for the cycling events” it organises, including the Tour de
France, La Vuelta, and Paris–Roubaix.
The email accused PCS of “riding on the coat tails of
certain ASO events for which it holds no media accreditation by conspicuously
parking a campervan branded with the ‘ProCyclingStats.com’ trademark.”
Van der Zwan says a tense meeting followed. “I opened the
meeting and had five people against me instead of one, including their highest
lawyer. They only wanted to tell me ‘We don’t want you here anymore.’”
The impasse was resolved with a compromise: PCS would
remain, but the branding had to go. Van der Zwan has leaned into the absurdity
of the demand with a tongue-in-cheek workaround.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 8visitors 8
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
15 Comments