Despite his best efforts, Mathieu van der Poel couldn't match Tadej Pogacar when the latter made his ultimately race-winning attack on the final ascent of the Oude Kwaremont at the 2025 Tour of Flanders on Sunday afternoon. As it turns out though, Van der Poel himself might not have been at 100%, following a secret pre-race illness that plagued his preparation in the week prior.
Any talk of such an illness was kept totally hush-hush ahead of the Tour of Flanders, but following his team leader's 3rd placed finish at the line, Alpecin-Deceuninck boss Christoph Roodhooft revealed all in discussion with Sporza. "Nothing can be done about it," begins Roodhooft's reflections. "We hoped for a perfect day, but clearly, the end was just too much for him."
And on the actual illness, Roodhooft revealed: "He casually told me on April 1st (last Tuesday) that he was very sick. 'Don’t laugh,’ I told him. But he had to take antibiotics for three days. It was a tough lead-up. Being ill is never pleasant, and he missed a few training sessions."
This illness was actually already at play for Van der Poel during the E3 Saxo Classic, despite him taking that win on that day. "He was already sniffling during the E3. We felt it was getting better, but then it got worse. There’s nothing you can do about it," Roodhooft recalls.
There was also a mid-race blow for Van der Poel as the Dutchman crashed relatively early on. "That crash also came at the wrong time," Roodhooft added. "His shoulder seems to be hurting, though I haven’t spoken to him yet. Mathieu managed to get back into the race fairly quickly, and we gave him his good bike back. He’s sensitive to those things."
"It’s not that we were outnumbered, though. We did lose some riders, but the same happened to other teams as well. You always hold onto a quiet hope. On the second Kwaremont, I thought it was impressive how he responded to Pogacar’s attack," the Alpecin-Deceuninck boss concludes. "You hope for a perfect day, but in the end, it was just too much. But the difference wasn’t huge, mind you."
Tadej Pogacar wins the Tour of Flanders AGAIN! 👏👏👏
— Cycling on TNT Sports (@cyclingontnt) April 6, 2025
🌈 The rainbow jersey cruises to a solo victory in the final race of the Belgium classics. #RVV pic.twitter.com/RDaHRyP7ds
Why Maria, what is your reasoning? He was already ill during E3, thought he’d get over it but it got worse which is probably when he took them. His doc will be amongst the best-informed and his infection perfectly analysed. Read this and stop relying on generalised outdated assumptions about antibiotical treatment, part of the reason they may soon no longer be effective at all. “ In 2008, one of us (L.B.R.) posited that of the different ways the medical community could reduce the amount of antibiotic treatment prescribed, the one that seemed safest and most achievable was to treat infections only for as long as necessary to achieve optimal cure rates (1). It is difficult and potentially dangerous for providers not to prescribe antibiotics at all, but it should be easier to convince them not to prescribe antibiotics for so long. The evidentiary basis of traditional durations of antibiotic therapy is that a week is 7 days (2), which is why tried-and-true antibiotic regimens are 7 to 14 days long. The definition of a week was decreed by Roman Emperor Constantine the Great nearly 2000 years ago (2). This seems an unsatisfactory evidentiary basis for modern medical practice. Fortunately, in recent years, more than 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of short-course versus traditional, longer courses of antibiotic therapy for the treatment of community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis and sinusitis, complicated urinary and intra-abdominal infections, Gram-negative bacteremia, acute bacterial skin infections, osteomyelitis and septic arthritis, and even neutropenic fever (3, 4). All RCTs for these diseases and 2 meta-analyses of these RCTs (5, 6) found no difference in efficacy between shorter and traditional courses of antibiotic therapy. Of note, the short-course regimens that were studied were typically not based on Constantine’s 7-day week. For pneumonia specifically, 8 RCTs have shown that 3- to 5-day courses of antibiotic therapy are at least as effective as 7- to 14-day courses for community-acquired pneumonia”
ahhh, I don't know it, yes, I'm used to 7 days of antibiotic therapy. Thank you for the information!
It’s totally normal people don’t generally know, the way doctors continue in their old-fashioned ways. SHOCKING even to see how often they prescribe then without even knowing or testing if your infection is viral or bacterial, even when governments have already launched information campaigns. It’s as if their on the manufacturers’ payroll and exploiting patients.
In this case, maybe is my fault (my ignorance). Fortunately, my family hasn't been sick for many, many years, so I can't say if doctors in Italy are still old-fashioned. When we catch a cold (very mild, nothing that requires medical attention), we recover completely in about a week. This may have reinforced my belief in the 7-day cure. Thank you so much, MisterM
A lot of medicine does nothing more than speed up recovery time 4-5 days instead of 7-8, 10-12 instead of 2 weeks. It is questionable if it’s really a good thing for healthy people to rely on it as it also makes your immune system lazy and less responsive next time round, making you more and more reliant on medication (surprise, surprise). A bit like glasses, the less you succumb to adapting their strength, the slower the deterioration. Unfortunately many bacterial infections are not so easy to fight without help, your body should manage in the end but it can take really long, I once had strong fever for 3 months trying to fight an infection without reducing work or lifestyle (the antibiotics at the beginning didn’t help).
Yes, I completely agree! Before going to a doctor, I give my immune system time to react. If a reasonable amount of time passes and I'm not cured, then I go to the doctor. Fortunately, I haven't needed a doctor in years!