Tom Dumoulin evaluates possible nomination of Olav Kooij for Tour de France: "I think they will only take Kooij if it is really doubtful in what form Vingegaard will enter the Tour"
Cycling
Visma | Lease a Bike already had a difficult selection puzzle heading into the Tour de France, and that puzzle did not become any easier on Thursday afternoon when another two riders from projected lineup crashed hard. Steven Kruijswijk and Dylan van Baarle abandoned Critérium du Dauphiné with fractures and even the form of designated leaders is still up in the air as they won't turn up to any competitions until Tour de France.
"It really is a difficult puzzle," said Tom Dumoulin as NOS analyst. Jonas Vingegaard, Wout van Aert and Christophe Laporte are currently at altitude in Tignes, but the question remains whether they will be ready in time for the Tour de France. Still, Dumoulin thinks that for the time being it is still the idea to let them start. "And then we have Matteo Jorgenson, Sepp Kuss and Tiesj Benoot racing here in the Dauphiné. Well, normally you would have added Van Baarle and Kruijswijk and then you had eight men for the Tour."
Read also
But replacements are needed for Van Baarle and Kruijswijk. The names of Jan Tratnik, Attila Valter, Ben Tulett and Wilco Kelderman are mentioned, but Dumoulin also thinks of the less-experienced Bart Lemmen and especially sprinter Olav Kooij .
"Kooij is of course not a helper, is he? You don't put Kooij in the front. You would have one less domestique for the GC. I think they will only take Kooij if it is really doubtful in what form Vingegaard will go to the Tour. Or if he doesn't go to the Tour at all. Then the young Kooij can save the Tour by winning a stage."
Read also
Dumoulin likes this 'Plan D'. "If you don't choose Vingegaard, you can go for a stage win and the green jersey with Kooij and Van Aert. And then Kuss and Jorgenson can fight for the top five and the polka dot jersey. If you take three stages and a top five place, then you can call it a very good Tour."
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments








