"Hopefully Pogacar doesn't interfere” – Wout van Aert anticipates battle with Tour de France winner in Paris
Cycling
Wout van Aert has one last chance to end his three-year
drought of Tour de France stage victories, and he’s aiming squarely at Sunday’s
finale in Paris. The Team Visma | Lease a Bike rider made a bid to get into the
breakaway on Stage 20 but couldn’t make it stick. Instead, the win went to
Kaden Groves, leaving Van Aert with one more opportunity to get that win he
craves. The final stage won’t follow the traditional Champs-Élysées script, with
a Montmartre climb on the menu, it may play to Van Aert’s strengths.
"It was another tough start, and in the first part of
the stage, I didn't have the legs I'd hoped for," Van Aert told HLN.
"I tried a few times, but I couldn't really get into the breakaway."
He described being caught in limbo as the race unfolded: “Halfway through the
stage, I ended up with a group between the peloton and the leading group.
“But because most of them already had someone in the front,
we ended up in no-man's land.” Van Aert also pointed to what he saw as a
tactical misstep by organisers, noting, “It's the biggest race in the world,
and it's normal for riders to sprint for a podium finish. I think the
organizers were more at fault here, putting that turn in the last 500 meters.”
Despite the frustrations, Van Aert is looking ahead.
"I'm much more motivated for this final stage than before. Montmartre will
be more of a classic. I expect a short, explosive race that should suit
me."
With the terrain likely to shake up a typical sprint, his
chances may improve, but he’s keeping one eye on the overall winner.
"Hopefully Pogacar doesn't interfere. (laughs) He certainly doesn't look
very motivated anymore, but you never know with him."
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 8visitors 8
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- the 'No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines' comment was unfortunately a bit off. didn't you just boast about your principles in the comments section of another article?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...Dariusz08-11-2026
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
5 Comments