Preview. Stage 3 of the Tour de Pologne will be another day for the overall classification with a hilltop finish where differences are expected.
The third stage of the race will be a very difficult one. A classic Polish day of racing, and by that of course I am referring to the start and finishing locations which will be the biggest challenge for commentators on the day to pronounce! However riders find a hard day, 300 meters of climbing, a lot focused in the first kilometers. A punchy start and two categorized climbs can see a strong breakaway going up the road, however simultaneously it is very early in the race to see meaningful groups having the freedom to be formed.
Read also

Stage 3: Walbrzych - Duszniki-Zdrój, 162.9 kilometers
The riders don't find much flat terrain however. Even after the two classified ascents (3.3Km at 7.2%; 7.7Km at 5.1%) there are two more ascents where in the peloton some will struggle. Then there will be some rest, but a climb will come closer to the finish where damage will be done. It's 4.5 kilometers long at 6%, again not a brutal one but it will thin down the field, it summits only with 16 kilometers to go - with the KOM sprint a bit later on, and a fast descent into the finishing climb.
With 2 kilometers to go the riders take two tricky corners, there will be a very very fast run-up to that spot, and then it begins to drag uphill. The attacks won't surge there however, but instead in the final 900 meters which average almost 9%. It's a pure anaerobic effort, the toughest gradients of 15% are from 700 to 400 meters to go, the differences can be made there, however one way or another this will suffocate the riders, and the run-up to the line will be a struggle to survive with whichever legs the riders have left.
Read also

Duszniki-Zdrój: 900 meters, 8.7%
The Weather

Map Tour de Pologne 2023 stage 3
Strong western wind. It will make it a tense day, crosswinds will be present in some places and the risk of there being splits is real, it will make the day more demanding. The final kilometers will be almost completely with crosswinds, it won't be either good or bad for those looking to attack.
Read also
The Favourites
Matej Mohoric - Mohoric is not a specialist on the steep climbs, but he's punchy enough in this field to win. Having won today's stage will make him perhaps the man to beat tomorrow as the final ascent is shorter and more explosive. The day features a lot of climbing but no big attacks will come before the 15% ramp. He's in the race lead and can strike.
João Almeida - This isn't really a finale where teams can play tactically, it's all about positioning into the final climb and then having legs, a fully anaerobic effort where slipstreaming matters little actually. Also not ideal for João Almeida who prefers the high mountains, however he's got great form shown today, and he has proven in the past to also be able to ride quite well in these steep walls.
Read also
The finale tomorrow should see the very same faces in the front. The day features climbs but it's all about the final one. Today a group of riders looked superior to the rest and the Top10 should have the same names, the same riders will be suited to the finale. All were a little below the top two but can put on a bigger fight, specially as the shorter ascent may see more riders with legs into the sprint.
Michal Kwiatkowski, Oscar Onley and Samuele Battistella may be more favoured as they are puncheurs. On the opposite side you have Ilan van Wilder, Lenny Martínez, Eddie Dunbar, Lennert van Eetvelt, Sylvain Moniquet and Rafal Majka. Lightweight riders may also be slightly favoured as in those gradients every kg will weight.
Read also
Prediction Tour de Pologne 2023 stage 3:
*** Matej Mohoric, João Almeida
** Michal Kwiatkowski, Lenny Martínez, Ilan van Wilder
* Oscar Onley, Samuele Battsitella, Eddie Dunbar, Sylvain Moniquet, Lennert van Eetvelt, Rafal Majka
** Michal Kwiatkowski, Lenny Martínez, Ilan van Wilder
* Oscar Onley, Samuele Battsitella, Eddie Dunbar, Sylvain Moniquet, Lennert van Eetvelt, Rafal Majka
Pick: João Almeida
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
🇵🇱 Tak prezentuje się mapa 80. Tour de Pologne UCI WorldTour! To będzie naprawdę wyjątkowa edycja. 🇵🇱🚴 🇬🇧 This is the map of the 80th Tour de Pologne UCI WorldTour! This is going to be a really special edition. 🇵🇱🚴 — #TdP2023
Write a comment













