Historic start! Tadej Pogacar wins stage 1 of Criterium du Dauphiné outsprinting Vingegaard, Van der Poel and Evenepoel
Cycling
Stage 1 of the Criterium du Dauphiné will be one that will be very memorable after an explosive finale that saw the very best of the peloton move away off the front in the final kilometers that were not too hard. Tadej Pogacar has won the stage and has jumped into the first yellow jersey, beating Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel and Remco Evenepoel in a small group sprint.
Paul Oruselin and Pierry Thierry formed the day's breakaway, a modest group for a stage that would be awarding the first yellow jersey of the race besides a stage win. The duo was easy to control in the peloton and lastly the Arkéa rider was caught with around 30 kilometers to go but this was after Fred Wright launched an attack from the peloton.
Read also
The Briton was then isolated for many kilometers in an attempt to surprise, a good idea overall as he reached the final climb with 6 kilometers to go. It was a brave move that almost succeeded but on the climb Axel Laurance launched a brutal attack that split the group to pieces. Over the top Lukas Nerurkar tried to go ahead, but quickly Tadej Pogacar, Mathieu van der Poel, Jonas Vingegaard and Santiago Buitrago moved off the front and were joined by Remco Evenepoel.
Lidl-Trek quickly began to work to try and bring the group back together, something possible because of the non-perfect collaboration out front. Mathieu van der Poel launched an early sprint but this potentially cost him the victory as he lacked the legs in the final kilometers and in the victory was...
Tadej Pogacar, who outsprinted Jonas Vingegaard to the finish line in what was a very thrilling finale where the peloton managed to catch the front group but couldn't get around it. Mathieu van der Poel sprinted to third on the day.
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 7visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments





