"When they're young and dumb, they don't care if they hit the ground" - Lance Armstrong on what makes successful sprinters
Cycling
Lance Armstrong was never a top sprinter, but having spent many years in the peloton alongside them - specially at the Tour de France - the American has seen what makes a successful sprinter, and one specific detail which sees the fast finishers lose their competitive edge.
"So these dudes at the end of the race that are sprinting at 40 plus miles per hour, rubbing elbows, bump and grind and you can sprint at 40 miles per hour," Armstrong said in a recent interview. "When 200 guys are going for the line, it's like NASCAR, right?
"And so, but when they start having kids, like without naming names, I mean 'kid one' they go from first to third to seventh because they lose that fearlessness, that sort of gladiator just like 'fuck it, whatever it takes to win, I don't care if I hit the ground'. When they're young and dumb, they don't care if they hit the ground."
Whilst the rule does not apply to all riders, there is definitely a pattern in which the successful sprinters are emerging younger and younger in the current peloton; as well as sprinters who come from other disciplines of cycling.
Read also
He is right. But not only sprinters have that. Also the GC guys who suddenly go down hill a tiny bit more careful. Normal reaction.
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- so excited to see remco back!! Cycling only gets better from herebruins3011-04-2025
- That tire clearance means little with the new UCI rules on tire width.Veganpotter11-04-2025
- If you do the rounds on non-Anglo commentators you’ll find plenty more, every cycling nation has good and bad ones.Mistermaumau10-04-2025
- Nathan is one of the best former pros commenting during races - up there with Sean Kelly and Nico Roche imo - McEwen, Blythe, you can keep themCrashjames10-04-2025
- Impressive and surprising, well done. Go for it more often please.Mistermaumau10-04-2025
- Good choice of profile picture by the way :-)Mistermaumau10-04-2025
- Bolt was an outlier, for some people it can’t exist. Funny thing is 3 generations later, a lot of amateurs reach the level the average pro had. Ok, maybe counting from today it might be 5 or 6 generations because we won’t all have access to the equipment and staff and assistance pros now need to perform.Mistermaumau10-04-2025
- Actually, I’ve not noticed that fans have even noticed results are provisional so as far as the sport itself goes, I wouldn’t worry too much. Obviously some riders will miss out on celebrating but then these days, they’re all paid so well that it’s quite a small price to pay. Andy Schleck certainly didn’t get to party like he was used to when he received Alberto’s trophy and titles, nevertheless, he’s in the books and I’m sure he feels like and gets treated like a tdf winner. CATCHING dopers is good for the sport, though at the moment I’d have no idea who to go looking for.Mistermaumau10-04-2025
- Someone like David Walsh, who was the point person in the Sky Team coverup? When there was money and fame in bringing down Armstrong, he went for that. Then he sold that crusader image to Sky. And then renounced them. The guy has made more money from athletes and doping without ever once competing himself, having to take drugs, or even stand for a single principle. He is no different than Novitzsky, who was pivotal in the Armstrong investigations, and helped put Marion Jones in jail. Now he is full-time in the coverup business for the UFC.
Barney10-04-2025 - Do you think that making results provisional for 10 years makes for good sport? Or in any way remotely fairer, or safer?Barney10-04-2025