Lance Armstrong and his controversial opinion on trans athletes: "It's a very simple thing: you want to transition, transition. Have your own category"
Cycling
The internationally renowned cyclist, Lance Armstrong, has caused a stir on the TV show 'Stars on Mars', where a group of celebrities live together in a camp simulating life on Mars. During a conversation with wrestler Ronda Rousey, Armstrong proposed the creation of a separate category for trans athletes, which generated an intense debate and various reactions from other participants.
In the midst of the 'Stars on Mars' camp, Lance Armstrong and Ronda Rousey addressed the issue of transgender athletes. Armstrong suggested the creation of a new division for them, arguing that if they want to transition, they should have their own category. His words generated immediate controversy and criticism from some of the other celebrity participants:
Read also
"It's a very simple thing: you want to make the transition, make the transition. Have your own category. We're going to make a new division for you. What could be unfair about that?"
The opinion of Tinashe
Singer Tinashe was one of the first to express her disagreement with Armstrong's proposal. According to her, differentiating people based on their gender identity is not beneficial to their mental health. For Tinashe, excluding trans athletes from the same spaces and places as others would be harmful and counterproductive.
Read also
The defense of Lance Armstrong
In response to the criticism received, Lance Armstrong defended himself by arguing that no one is being excluded, and that his proposal is based on a sporting perspective. Although he clarified that he is not a right-wing person and considers himself a liberal, he stated that from that point of view, it would be fair to create a separate category for trans athletes.
Ariel Winter's position
Actress Ariel Winter, known for her role in the hit series 'Modern Family', spoke out against Armstrong's words. Winter stated that the cyclist's proposal would lead to ostracizing people who do not fit into predefined categories. In his opinion, it is important not to exclude anyone and to accept diversity in all areas, including sport.
Read also
The intervention of Porsha Williams
Porsha Williams, another of the program's participants, tried to put an end to the debate, suggesting that it was not the right place to discuss such a sensitive topic. She reminded Lance Armstrong that they were on a television show and not in the comfort of his home, and that some topics should be treated with greater care.
Conclusion
Lance Armstrong's proposal to create a separate category for trans athletes in the reality show 'Stars on Mars' has generated intense debate among the program's participants. While some consider that differentiating people based on their gender identity can be harmful and exclusionary, others argue from a sports perspective, seeking a balance between inclusion and fair competition. As the debate continues, the discussion on the participation of trans athletes in different sports disciplines will continue to be an important topic in today's society.
Read also

Juan LarraCycling Journalist
Juan Larra is a writer for Cyclinguptodate and editor-in-chief of Ciclismoaldia, where he has played a central role since its inception. Under his leadership, the website has become a trusted source for professional cycling coverage, offering in-depth analysis, news, and feature stories.
A sports journalist with over 20 years of experience, Juan earned his degree in Journalism from the University of Seville in 2007. He began his career covering a wide range of sports—including football, basketball, Formula 1, MotoGP, tennis, and cycling—for platforms such as the official La Liga app, Vodafone and Movistar websites, NBA Blogdebasket, and Cadena Cope, honing his skills in writing and editorial management.
In addition to his work at Ciclismoaldia, Juan contributes to Cyclinguptodate and serves as editor-in-chief for the tennis-focused site Tenisaldia. Throughout his career, he has conducted exclusive interviews with cyclists and sports figures, provided detailed analysis of competitions ranging from local Spanish races to major international events, and acted as a special correspondent at prestigious races including Paris-Roubaix, the Tour de France, and the Vuelta a España.
Juan’s combination of experience, expertise, and direct access to athletes has established him—and the platforms he leads—as authoritative voices in professional cycling.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
The fact Lance Armstrong has an opinion on anybody in sports after doping for years…THE MALE AUDACITY!!!!
Write a comment









