Chechu Rubiera on the sanctions against the US Postal Service and Lance Armstrong: "There was hatred towards the figure of Armstrong, Pantani tested positive and nobody attacked him"
Cycling
Chechu Rubiera was the first luxury domestique Lance Armstrong had at US Postal. Johan Bruyneel signed him from Kelme, a team in which he had achieved 2 great stage victories in the Giro d'Italia and had also twice finished in the top 10 in the premiere Italian stage race.
The Spaniard accompanied Armstrong in his triumphs in the Tour de France between 2001 and 2005, being key in the mountain stages. That impressive US Postal train that ensured no rider was capable of breaking free off the front was led by the man from Gijón.
In an interview with the Jot Down teammates, Rubiera recounted how his signing for the North American team came to be: "They called me because they needed to strengthen the team in the mountains. The offer was to compete in the Tour de France as Armstrong's domestique and, the rest of the season, an alternative calendar in which I was more free and also had options to shine. I also wanted to learn English; something that I saw could serve me the rest of my life."
He explains Armstrong's strategy to win an important stage of the 2001 Tour. "When the Tour reached the Pyrenees and Alps, there were only three of the team left: Armstrong, Roberto Heras and me. We could not cope with the control of the race, and Armstrong, in a strategy that was very cool to see from a fan point of view, made everyone believe that he was not well and went to the tail so that others could take the lead. control. Arriving at the foot of Alpe d'Huez, we attacked and won the stage; That's where Armstrong sealed the Tour."
DOPING
The interesting interview with the Jot Down companions reaches its climax when Rubiera goes into detail about doping and the fact that the UCI decided to take the Tour de France from Lance Armstrong and not give it to the second placed riders.
"When Armstrong is sanctioned and the tours are taken away, they are not given to the second, when it was always understood that if the first one doped, it was said 'you out', and the second the winner. Those tours were deserted. The organizers , the UCI, they said: Come on, we took it from Armstrong, but what do we give it to, to Zülle, who was in the Festina case; to Ullrich, who was in Operation Puerto...? Now, fortunately, the mentality of the athlete, that of the sponsor and that of the fan are different; everything changed".
He was asked about the fact that USADA (the American anti-doping agency) had described the US Postal doping of those years as "the most sophisticated, professional and successful doping program in the history of sport":
"Well, it seems to me that it responds to a feeling of hatred or animosity towards the figure of Armstrong on the part of the people who were at that time - I don't know if they are still now - managing the World Anti-Doping Agency and especially the American Anti-Doping Agency. Armstrong had a personal struggle with them and they with Armstrong; there was something personal there."
Chechu Rubiera affirms that what the US Postal did was also done by many other teams and brokers who, however, did not receive a penalty as strong as Lance Armstrong:
"What you can read that was done in the US Postal Service, you can also read that it was done in Telekom or ONCE; and yet, the objective was always Armstrong; to destroy Armstrong. Pantani tested positive and nobody attacked him "Although he did end badly, psychologically sunk. Ullrich also had problems and I don't think the World Anti-Doping Agency dealt with him like they did with Armstrong. Other runners who admitted they had doped or tested positive were told:" Come on, a two-year sanction", and yet the US Postal workers, the doctors and others, were sanctioned for life."
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling forRafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
Una relación en la que saltaron chispas: @albertocontador & @lancearmstrong. #InformeGregarios
2 Comments