Jumbo-Visma and Soudal - Quick-Step may end up uniting as one team in the coming years. Although unlikely, the possibility of Remco Evenepoel teaming up with the likes of Jonas Vingegaard, Primoz Roglic and Sepp Kuss is possible. Thijs Zonneveld sees this as possible good news for the Belgian.
"I really didn't see this coming. Of course I also called around and it does indeed seem that it is a very serious option," the Dutch analyst said in the Het Wiel podcast. "It depends on who you put yourself in. Lefevere wants to get rid of his team and the shares, so for him it seems a very logical and desirable move. And Soudal Quick-Step has contracted or re-signed very few riders in recent weeks. So I understand it from Lefevere's point of view."
Whilst it is unlikely that anything will happen in this winters' window, into 2025 the chances increase, in what could be a beneficial situation for a few in both teams. Zonneveld believes that uniting Evenepoel with the staff and work methods of Jumbo-Visma could take the time-trial World Champion to a new level, that he has not reached yet.
"It would actually be nice for Evenepoel if the teams merged. Of course, leading in the Grand Tours will be difficult. But he would like better guidance, better nutrition plans, etc. And if it is true, he will end up with the team where such things are best arranged," he argues. "It is also a good move from that point of view. But if you look at it from the perspective of the other party, you really don't understand what benefit they would get from it."
The difference in mentality, communication and work methods is a very important point in the Dutchman's point of view. "They are two completely different teams. Jumbo-Visma is the best cycling team in the world. Everything works there." However, he questions the need for Jumbo's desire to make this move happen, as they have already won all Grand Tours this year - with whole podium at the Vuelta - and have little space to improve in a place where Evenepoel would in theory add the most.
"They don't really need a rider like Evenepoel... All other Soudal Quick-Step riders are good, but not better than those of Jumbo-Visma. How are you going to fit that in? [...] The only reason for Jumbo-Visma to merge with Soudal Quick-Step is that they see no option to attract another sponsor," Zonneveld argues. "It is a complete mismatch both culturally and sportingly!'
However he fears that if the merger goes through, it ultimately leads to the demise of other teams, who will find themselves racing against even stronger competition, and have less gains from the money invested in their teams - beside the likelihood that the end of one team would cause a chain reaction leading to more riders and staff losing their place in the peloton.
"It's bad news for cycling, because they apparently haven't found a new sponsor. It's just one team less, isn't it? There is less room for riders, because there is probably less money involved. If such a large team cannot find a sponsor, that is really bad for cycling. Maybe they think that the riders will complain because they want more money and otherwise they will leave. If this is one of your few options, then maybe you should do it. But you don't do this out of luxury. That is extremely worrying," he concluded.
Read also
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment