"Promotion-degradation system for teams essentially destroys the race" - UCI rankings system annoying even to promoted riders
Cycling
Benjamin Declercq currently rides for Arkea-Samsic but it won’t be the same case for the much longer. The cycling season has come to an end, and the new season will kick off in just two months, but Declercq’s future in professional cycling remains uncertain. The rider has yet to find his new team.
"That promotion-degradation system for teams essentially destroys the race a bit," Declercq told Het Laatste Nieuws. He continues, "I understand that there is a points system to distinguish between WorldTour and ProContinental teams, but it is not objective. To give an example, one-day races are overvalued. The second place in a Tour stage earns only 50 points, a third place in GP d'Isbergues 70 points."
Read also
Arkea Samsic will be promoted to the WorldTour, but this promotion comes at a cost. "Only the points of the ten best-scoring riders from each team were taken into account for the UCI ranking. This year the tactics at our team were adjusted accordingly. Even before the season, it was determined who the ten riders would be who would provide the points," explained Declercq.
Declercq, unfortunately, was not among those selected ten riders, and this cost him potential victories. "The fact that I then had to stop my legs in a promising situation was very demotivating. How can you make yourself attractive to other teams as a rider when your contract is over? You then end up remaining exemplary in your role in the hope that your team appreciates that," said Declercq.
Read also
Due to the lack of accomplishments to show to potential teams, he is finding it hard to negotiate a new contract. "I can only speak for myself, but there will still be riders who recognize my situation. Riders who engaged in the promotion-degradation battle in the interest of the team and now find themselves on the street. I obviously bring understanding for the team and its tactical choices, but because of the excesses of the promotion-degradation system, some riders are now the victims and that is particularly unfortunate,” concluded Declercq.
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Not the biggest win yesterday at pro kermesse Zele, but it does feel really good after everything that happened over the past two years
1 Comments










