The overall classification contenders had a key day today at the Tour de France's sole time-trial but they won't be able to relax on a stage that was seemingly for the sprinters. We preview stage 8 of the Tour, a day where the many small climbs can see a breakaway succeed but the strong crosswinds can cause chaos once again.
Stage 8 is an interesting one, most likely for the sprinters, but throughout the 176 kilometers there will be plenty small ascents. A rough day to control and a difficult one for the pure sprinters; it also provides a good opportunity for breakaways and late attacks.
Stage 8: Semur-en-Auxois - Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises, 176 kilometers
2300 meters of climbing, it really is an unusual day. Some sprinters will definitely be annoyed as right from the gun there'll be climbing. Three categorized climbs within the first hour of racing, two more halfway through the stage, but a few more equally difficult little climbs throughout the day.
With 14 kilometers to go ends a 1.7-kilometer long climb at 5%. With 6 kilometers to go there is a smaller ascent with similar gradient. Attacks may happen, but I think overall these will serve to suffocate a few sprinters. The pure sprinters should still be in contention, but the final kilometer is also not favourable to them.
It's absolutely not technical, with no corners or street furniture anywhere in the final kilometers. The riders will soar through fields into Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises and the final meters will have a gradient of 4% for the sprint.
The Weather
Map Tour de France 2024 stage 8
Moderately strong western wind, as was the case on stage 6. And again, like stage 6, most of the stage heads straight north which means crosswinds will be frequent and echelons are possible. The start has a tailwind, most of the stage in crosswinds until 23 kilometers to go where it turns into a headwind. If a bunch sprint is to happen, the final kilometers are in an exposed cross-headwind straight.
The Favourites
First and foremost we must pay attention to the GC riders. It's unlikely that there will be major efforts for a breakaway right from the start as that's been the trend in this race, and we know that the GC teams will swarm the front of the peloton throughout most of the day, accelerating into every little town and hill. Realistically this is a day where a breakaway could thrive, but in the first week not many riders will be desperate to make a move.
Win from the front would require some of the best rouleurs to be present there. Those in the main GC teams won't. But I'm talking about names such as Ben Healy, Matej Mohoric, Jasper Stuyven, Bruno Armirail, Jonas Abrahamsen, Stefan Küng, Alberto Bettiol, Victor Campenaerts and Oier Lazkano.
A sprint at the end of the day remains the most likely choice. The likes of Mark Cavendish and Fabio Jakobsen I would say are not too likely to make it to the end of the day if the pace is indeed hard. This won't be a pure sprint stage, but there are a lot of fast men who can climb well and survive this type of terrain. Dylan Groenewegen, Phil Bauhaus, Fernando Gaviria and Arnaud Démare will also want a conservative day so as to have their best chances to succeed.
On the opposite, riders such as Arnaud De Lie, Wout van Aert, Mads Pedersen, Bryan Coquard, Marijn van den Berg could really use a difficult day to burn off the explosiveness of their fellow sprinters.
In the middle we have riders such as Jasper Philipsen, Biniam Girmay, Alexander Kristoff and Sam Bennett who I wouldn't either say a hard day benefits of harms them.
Prediction Tour de France 2024 stage 8:
*** Jasper Philipsen, Arnaud De Lie
** Dylan Groenewegen, Biniam Girmay, Mads Pedersen
* Jonas Abrahamsen, Alberto Bettiol, Mark Cavendish, Phil Bauhaus, Fernando Gaviria, Bryan Coquard, Wout van Aert, Alexander Kristoff, Sam Bennett
** Dylan Groenewegen, Biniam Girmay, Mads Pedersen
* Jonas Abrahamsen, Alberto Bettiol, Mark Cavendish, Phil Bauhaus, Fernando Gaviria, Bryan Coquard, Wout van Aert, Alexander Kristoff, Sam Bennett
Pick: Arnaud De Lie
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 5visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...Dariusz08-11-2026
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment