🇪🇸 Eusebio Unzué, Movistar team manager 🗣️ "Why not allow substitutes when a rider is forced to abandon a Grand Tour during the first week? All teams prepare 10-12 riders for a Grand Tour, so you still got 2 or 3 of them at home." (L'Équipe)
Lefevere, on Unzué's substitutions idea: "Cycling is not football. Who is going to decide when an injury or illness is real?"
CyclingThursday, 08 February 2024 at 05:46
Eusebio Unzué, director of the Movistar team, has recently raised the possibility of introducing a system of substitutions in cycling, with the aim of providing a more human approach to racing. However, his colleague Patrick Lefevere, leader of the Belgian team, Soudal Quick-Step, does not share this vision.
Unzué proposes that, in the event that a rider drops out during the first week of a grand tour, teams should have the opportunity to replace him. He argues that this would be fair to those riders who are left out of the main lineup, despite having prepared for the competition. He believes that cycling needs to evolve and adopt more humane rules.
However, Lefevere disagrees with this idea. Speaking to Het Laatste Nieuws, he expressed his disagreement, arguing that allowing substitutions would erase the very essence of grand tours. He says the challenge lies in completing the three weeks of racing and that allowing changes would undermine the importance of endurance and the ability of teams to adapt.
"I've known Unzué for a long time. He has good intentions, but sometimes he is too sweet. In this case, I don't agree with him. With this rule, the whole history of grand tours is erased. It's just the challenge of maintaining three full weeks. Tour, Giro and Vuelta last 21 days, not 17 or 15. I also think it's human, but we're not going to turn them into wimps, are we?" commented Lefevere.
In addition, Lefevere points out that crashes and illness are inherent elements of cycling, and part of a team's merit lies in its ability to overcome these adversities and stick to a plan B:
"Unfortunately, falls and illnesses are part of it. So much of your team's success is in resilience, in being able to switch to a plan B. Those are the moments when great champions pick themselves up, bounce back after a setback: that's what people want to see. Management is boxing: just because you're on the ropes at one point doesn't mean you lose the field."
The Belgian manager also raises concerns about the feasibility of implementing a substitution system. He questions who would determine the severity of an injury or illness, and how it would distinguish between fatigue and medical conditions. He also expresses skepticism about the fairness of such a system and the ability of doctors to properly assess each situation:
"Cycling is not soccer. Who is going to decide when an injury or illness is real? I'm already looking forward to the VAR. It will be absolutely impartial and will no doubt be composed of French doctors. No, this is going to make our hair stand on end. I'm not going to stop it, but I'm not going to support it either. It will be for cycling after Lefevere".
MATXIN
On the other hand, Joxean Fernández Matxin, sport director of UAE Team Emirates, does not completely rule out Unzué's idea, but acknowledges its complexity. He suggests a simpler variant that would give each team the right to change one rider during the last week of the competition.
"It's complicated. Who's going to assess whether a fall is serious enough? How bad does an injury have to be? Does the kneecap have to be broken, or is knee pain enough? What about fatigue? After two weeks of running, exhaustion is a lot like being sick. Still, I love the idea itself. I'm in favor of a simple variant, without medical criteria: I would give each team the right to change a rider in the last week," Matxín commented.
claps 2visitors 756
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thanks Dadmobk22-12-2024
- Hard to believe with the advancment of modern medicine he can not find a cause for this.frieders321-12-2024
- You continue to platform these two cheats. With that in mind I can no longer use your site. I know my leaving means little, but, sometimes you have to take a stand. See ya!DJ21-12-2024
- Look at what Froome’s won since his last TdF, stop denying there is still more than possible one outcome to the future.Mistermaumau21-12-2024
- Bruyneel understands nothing about clean competition.Sweep21-12-2024
- Exactly. Remco won 3 WT races/stages last year compared to Pogocar's 19. Remco's single stage win in last years TdF earned him a meager 12 seconds over Pogocar who shellac'd him by 9 minutes in GC.Sweep21-12-2024
- Fortunately and as you point out, more than one strategy is possible and worth trying and I’m sure all concerned riders are well informed and counselled on this subject and don’t need such basic personal advice through media from an outsider.Mistermaumau21-12-2024
- The main SPOTY award is "decided" by public vote but the BBC "expert panel" decide who you can choose from, that choice has an equal split of genders and is focussed on the sports BBC show and a disabled athlete. Oh yea the ubiquitous "Pub Games" candidate there too, Darts and Snooker are not sports. The other awards are decided by the "Expert Panel" again it's about the sports BBC show, cycling has had it. Cav got his for his years and achievements in the sport, not just that 35th TDF win. Unless the BBC get access to Pro Cycling it will never feature "adequately" on SPOTYslappers6621-12-2024
- Ahhh..... you have to understand the "strange" diversity concepts of the BBCslappers6621-12-2024
- Avoiding him is a good strategy, you get more wins and then you can compete in the TDF relatively relaxed. Pit yourself against Pogi and not only there will be no wins, it will be considerable mental setbackabstractengineer21-12-2024