Expert believes Wout van Aert lost Paris-Roubaix in his head: "His fear after all those crashes makes him hit the brakes too often"
Cycling
Wout van Aert didn't really have many reasons to smile last year and the consequences of crashes that caused that state of mind continue to haunt him also in 2025. Although fourth places at Flanders and Roubaix sound okay on paper - they're not victories.
"Van Aert lost his race on a stretch of barely five kilometers, specifically in and after the Trouée d'Arenberg," cycling expert Marc Sergeant declares in analysis of Paris-Roubaix at Het Nieuwsblad.
Read also
"First, it was his own fault," he's of the opinion that Van Aert is 'too kind'. "Van Aert insisted that his legs were not good enough in the Trouée d'Arenberg. But look at the images, and you realize something else is happening. Van Aert still enters Trouée d'Arenberg in a good position. But when Pogacar goes to the front, you see him fighting with Pedersen for Pogacar's wheel at a particular moment. That's where it goes wrong. Is he too kind?"
Van Aert lost the battle in the chaos, but according to Sergeant, it may also have been due to something else. "Is it his fear after all those crashes that makes him hit the brakes more often than before? But you see Van Aert hold his legs still for two seconds. And that is something you don't want to do. Giving in to the competition in that spot is catastrophic. Van Aert lost his momentum there and, with it, his speed, especially when he did it again shortly after. Holding his legs still again, losing that momentum again, losing his position and more time."
According to Sergeant, the fact that van Aert did not return after Trouée d'Arenberg was 'the merit of Van der Poel.' "The entire peloton has been focusing on Trouée d'Arenberg for hours, but after that stretch, there is often a pause. So Van der Poel shifted his focus to the stretch after Trouée d'Arenberg. He immediately attacked and decided to race there, not so much on the cobblestones but on the asphalt - a brilliant move."
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments








