Ex-pro would've preferred to see Jonas Vingegaard withdraw immediately after his Paris-Nice crash: "There's nothing wrong if you stop and take two weeks off"
Cycling
Neither this year will see Jonas Vingegaard have a smooth sail through his Tour de France preparation. As much as already clear when the Dane was forced to abandon Paris-Nice, but things got gloomier when tests revealed a small concussion on top of the hand injury. This puts the two-time Tour champion back two weeks in training.
In Wieler Revue, Jip van den Bos talks about the period after suffering a concussion which ultimately forced her to withdraw from cycling: "It was difficult for me, but I felt supported by my team Jumbo-Visma (now Team Visma | Lease a Bike, ed.). Only the cycling world couldn't really help me. Usually you're back after two weeks, but in cycling it's quite common for a concussion to last longer."
The Eurosport analyst and commentator knows how difficult it is to make a decision in a race, but watched Jonas Vingegaard in Paris-Nice with mixed feelings. The Dane continued riding after a crash, while he was dizzy. It was later determined that he indeed had a slight concussion and that he had to stay off the bike longer than hoped.
Van den Bos: "It's difficult during a race. In my opinion, the responsibility then lies with the rider. You shouldn't want it yourself. When I hear that, I think: you're taking so much on yourself. If you stop and take two weeks off, then there's nothing wrong. But by continuing to ride, you take the risk that it will continue to play a role."
"I can say: that risk is simply not worth it. Just get out. One race is nothing compared to a year of rehabilitation," she expresses. "It's because of my own experience, but I just think it's stupid to keep riding."
UCI addressed the issue recently by putting a concussion protocol into its rulebook, however it often remains complicated to apply in practice. "The UCI has developed cards with questions that you as team management have to ask after a crash. Only then can a rider continue. In itself a good idea, but often you crash, grab your bike and are gone before the team manager gets to you."
Van den Bos points out that riders need to think about their own health first. Especially in crashes where head may have been hurt. "That awareness must lie with the rider. He must think: I don't want to get off if I'm dizzy, because I don't want to take the risk of having long-term complaints."
Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 6visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...Dariusz08-11-2026
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment