Gent-Wevelgem, the longest cobbled classic leading up to the Tour of Flanders, offers a captivating spectacle, on the 30th March. While not as challenging as the renowned Flandrien monument, it remains a fiercely dynamic race, renowned for its explosive action and showcasing the talents of the top classics specialists year after year. We preview the race ahead.
Most of the 250-kilometer race is flat, not a hard profile which is the reason why in most years it is a reduced group sprint fighting it out for the win. The race is flat except for a hilly section which is based on three ascents of the Kemmelberg in which every year there are attacks, as well as off-road sections which have been added in recent years.
Read also

Ieper - Wevelgem, 250.5 kilometers
Through Belvedère, the riders will climb up twice. It’s a grueling ramp where many will suffer, splits will occur in the first time up with around 85 kilometers to go. From there on there will be a few gravel sectors known as the ‘plugstreets’, which will see 4.1 kilometers where mishaps may happen, a game of luck essentially when it comes to mechanicals, with the last one finishing with 67 kilometers to go.
The second time up the Kemmelberg will be with 56 kilometers to go and in this time up attacks are certain as the classics riders will want to push on the pace to definitely drop the fast men, and make a definitive difference.

Kemmelberg (Belvedere): 600 meters; 9.3%; 56Km to go
There are a couple of hilltops following, but the last place to make a difference based on power is the ascent to the Kemmelberg via the Ossuaire. It is a harder ascent, most of it on tarmac but with small-ring gradients before the riders hit the cobbles that go up to 18%. It’s a 30-second max effort where riders tend to crack near the summit, it comes with 34 kilometers to go.

Kemmelberg (Oussaire): 700 meters; 9.6%; 34Km to go
From there on though there will be relief as much of the approach to Wevelgem is completely flat. There will be time to reorganize, put on a chase for both smaller and bigger groups. The race has a very interesting dynamic where the specialists and the sprinters try to balance the race towards their preferred direction, and it’s a race that usually sees different types of scenarios that lead to the win.

Finale Gent-Wevelgem 2025
The Weather

Map Gent Wevelgem 2025
Dry but the wind will blow! As is usual in the region, strong winds will affect the race, and it will be strong enough to really make a strong impact. Early in the day the northwestern wind will mostly come as a headwind, but from 100 kilometers onwards this changes and threats loom large. The final 22 kilometers will have an almost exclusive strong tailwind which helps any attacker substantially.
Read also
The Favourites
Lidl-Trek - Mads Pedersen, defending champion, will certainly go on the attack. Brilliant form, it's how he won last year, it's how he races... But also the team already have in Jonathan Milan an ideal sprinter to challenge if it does come back to one. In the absence of Pogacar, van der Poel, van Aert and Ganna, he may be the strongest on the climbs, and in any scenario he will also be one of the strongest in a sprint - whilst Jasper Stuyven, Mathias Vacek and Toms Skujins can also play a role in an offensive race.
Jasper Philipsen - No Mathieu van der Poel at the start, and so the team will fully be looking towards a sprint. Gianni Vermeersch may be given a free role if he has the legs, but the team's best chances to win are certainly with the Belgian try to go for it in a final dash to the line.
Soudal - Quick-Step - Quick-Step don't have the men to battle the strongest men on the climbs, and the sprint is the absolute priority. It will be interesting, because both Tim Merlier and Paul Magnier are riders who seem well suited to such a race. Merlier will be the priority, and with his sprint power this year he can definitely win if it comes back to one.
Read also
We will have riders who will want to attack, with certainty UAE Team Emirates will try because it's their best shot at a win, with Tim Wellens the designated man for the climbs but Florian Vermeersch and Nils Politt as potential early attackers who are extremely dangerous for the flat finale. The likes of Joshua Tarling, Matteo Trentin and Alec Segaert are also extremely dangerous as strong rouleur, and in Visma (although Olav Kooij is present) Matteo Jorgenson is also certain to be up there in the climbs, attacking or covering moves - whilst Tiesj Benoot will be in a similar role. Bahrain duo Matej Mohoric and Fred Wright; Uno-X duo Jonas Abrahamsen and Rasmus Tiller are also important men to keep in consideration.
However most of the main figures present are sprinters, riders looking to see a conservative race and likely they will have men chasing in the final kilometers to try and brings things back as much as possible. Amongst these we have a very strong Jordi Meeus backed up by premium leadout man Danny van Poppel (who can also do the job himself); Olav Kooij leading Visma; Arnaud de Lie leading Lotto; Michael Matthews leading Jayco; Biniam Girmay leading Intermarché... And many more quality sprinters such as Sam Bennett, Phil Bauhaus, Alexander Kristoff, Soren Waerenskjold, Hugo Hofstetter, Giacomo Nizzolo, Madis Mihkels, Juan Sebastián Molano, Tobias Lund Andresen, Paul Penhoët, Luca Mozzato, Arnaud Démare and Marius Mayrhofer.
Read also
Prediction Gent Wevelgem 2025:
*** Mads Pedersen, Jonathan Milan
** Tim Merlier, Jasper Philipsen, Matteo Jorgenson, Tim Wellens
* Jasper Stuyven, Paul Magnier, Florian Vermeersch, Joshua Tarling, Matteo Trentin, Tiesj Benoot, Jordi Meeus, Olav Kooij, Arnaud De Lie, Michael Matthews, Biniam Girmay, Soren Waerenskjold, Madis Mihkels
** Tim Merlier, Jasper Philipsen, Matteo Jorgenson, Tim Wellens
* Jasper Stuyven, Paul Magnier, Florian Vermeersch, Joshua Tarling, Matteo Trentin, Tiesj Benoot, Jordi Meeus, Olav Kooij, Arnaud De Lie, Michael Matthews, Biniam Girmay, Soren Waerenskjold, Madis Mihkels
Pick: Mads Pedersen
How: Like last year, a win out of a reduced group... Let's say with Tim Wellens and Matteo Jorgenson.
Original: Rúben Silva
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment











