Christophe Vandegoor thinks Wout van Aert will dominate Paris-Roubaix - "Will lose less energy on the cobblestones due to his technical background as a crosser"
Cycling
With a team solely focused on his success, Wout van Aert is prepared to take part in the third monument of the cycling season. According to commentator Christophe Vandegoor's analysis of the team and van Aert's performance, winning the competition is a distinct possibility.
The Belgian was involved in a fall in Tour of Flanders, and Vandegoor believes it is possible that he is still struggling with that. "If Van Aert says that his ribs are bothering him, then we believe him. What you see is what you get,” he told Sporza.
Read also
He continues, "In Roubaix, there is also no Oude Kwaremont or an alien Tadej Pogacar. Moreover, Van Aert will lose less energy than his opponents on the cobblestones due to his technical background as a crosser."
Jumbo Visma has dispatched their top soldiers to assist their leader, and the team includes last year's champion, Dylan van Baarle. "But the most interesting question is about the role of Dylan van Baarle , last year's winner who has recovered from his fall in E3. Will he be 200 per cent in the service of Van Aert or is he the substitution leader,” said Vandegoor.
Read also
Other riders include Christophe Laporte, who celebrated victory in Gent-Wevelgem last month and Nathan Van Hooydonck. "His lieutenant Christophe Laporte also dreams of Paris-Roubaix. If the opportunity arises, he will not pass it up. Nathan Van Hooydonck was in the run in the Ronde, but questions were asked because he was not a real "finisher" Van Hooydonck will now reason: I'll let them smell a shit,” concluded Vandegoor.
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
🇫🇷 #ParisRoubaix This weekend🔥
Write a comment









