Bombshell! CAS declares Miguel Angel Lopez did not dope at 2022 Giro d'Italia and orders Astana pay him a large sum of back pay

Cycling
Friday, 10 May 2024 at 14:31
1052336985 625edd61f2ead
The CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport) considers that Miguel Angel Lopez did not dope in the 2022 Giro d'Italia and therefore condemns the Astana team to pay him salaries for the year 2022 due to what it considers as his unfair dismissal.
It should be remembered that 'Superman' as he's known, is suspended as a precautionary measure by the UCI after being investigated by the Guardia Civil as part of Operation Ilex for his connections with Dr. Marcos Maynar. According to the diario AS, UCI sources have confirmed that Astana Qazaqstan Team will have to pay the Colombian rider's back wages (the Kazakh team was forced to post a bond of more than one million euros in case this happened).
Astana presented to the CAS the report in which the Guardia Civil indicated that Lopez used menotropin at the Giro, a prohibited substance that, according to the UCI, would have caused an inflammation that then made him abandon the Grand Tour.
This theory of the Guardia Civil was also the one that led the UCI to sanction the cyclist as a precautionary measure. At the moment he is still unable to compete since the corresponding disciplinary procedure was opened 9 months ago. There is still no date for whether or not there will be a firm sanction for the rider, although we assume that this CAS resolution will speed up the process. For the moment, as we say, he is still unable to race.
claps 1visitors 1
8 Comments
abstractengineer 04 June 2024 at 16:04+ 3129

He is not innocent but they were not able to prove or supply enough evidence to convict. But he is dodgy as hell.

Mistermaumau 04 June 2024 at 12:55+ 3499

Normal if you base your whole case on suggested, potential, possible.

No evidence, no positive test, no trace. It was however convenient for Astana if they could get away with not paying.

Funny how in such cases no-one criticises the UCI.

User Avatar
StardustDragon 04 June 2024 at 13:25+ 1653

🤦🏻

Mistermaumau 04 June 2024 at 12:55+ 3499

Only one day after I tried explaining here the difference in authority and decision value between police and judges to people who don’t seem to want to understand because it complicates their world view. And in this case the UCI was neither.

User Avatar
DareDevil 04 June 2024 at 13:25+ 293

Superman is innocent!

Ben 04 June 2024 at 12:55+ 493

All this bs did a number on him, though. Quintana was screwed over the same way.

Mistermaumau 04 June 2024 at 13:25+ 3499

It is not even banned, strictly speaking. It is only banned for use on days of competition.

It has never really been proved to have performance enhancing effects but it does reduce certain pain.

Painkilling as doping is an interesting topic, at what level of painkilling do we consider a product doping? On the one hand you can suppress pain to ride better, on the other hand, can you forbid an injured or crashed rider from receiving something to relieve pain?

But yes, the POTENTIAL side effects (dizziness isn’t even the worst) make Tramadol a danger, to the rider and consequently also to those in vicinity.

That said, side effects are personal and rare, if you don’t suffer them there is no risk, so anyone taking it regularly knows if they get affected.

That also having been said, in general the UCI cannot rule individually so it has to be either banned or not and defined clearly. Medical exceptions may be necessary but that already leaves things less clear, doctors are notoriously different in needs interpretation.

User Avatar
StardustDragon 04 June 2024 at 13:25+ 1653

Funny, you guys are responding to a troll. He does not even know how to make proper comments. All he does is usually, trolling on here, (I mean, most of his comments are pretty negative, just pure complaining, throwing insults, etc).

The fact he's compare Miguel Angel Lopez's doping suspension, to Nairo Quintana's is shows how misinformed he really is. Tramadol is not a PED aka Performance enhanced drugs. Menotropine and Tramadol not the same thing. Not the same at all.

Examples of PEDs are Meldonium, Roxadustat. Both blood agent PEDs, which was banned by WADA.

I don't know Menotropine is PED or not, but it is not my concern.

He did throw insults at my comments, several times, (often so bad, I had to delate my comments, and redo it afterwards), for reasons I had no idea of🤔😒. And I don't even troll him. I got insulted by him, despite did not even stalk his comments :/

Just in

Popular news

Latest comments