ANALYSIS | Milano-Sanremo: The history of the monument that makes legends out of sprinters and climbers alike
Cycling
Every March, as winter gives way to spring, the cycling
world turns its attention to Italy for one of the most anticipated and most
beautiful races on the calendar: Milano-Sanremo.
Known as "La Primavera" (The Spring), this one-day
Monument is the longest professional race of the year and one of the most
unpredictable. Stretching nearly 300 kilometres from the northern city of Milan
to the coastal town of Sanremo, the race is a test of endurance, patience, and
perfectly timed execution.
Read also
While some Classics favour specialists, Milano-Sanremo is
unique in that a wide range of riders, from sprinters to punchers and even time
trialists, can realistically dream of victory.
It’s so unpredictable, that not even Tadej Pogacar has won
the race. Yet.
History
The origins of Milan-Sanremo date back to the early 20th
century when Tullo Morgagni, a journalist for La Gazzetta dello Sport,
proposed a long-distance race from Milan to Sanremo. The first edition, held in
1907, saw only 14 of the 33 starters reach the finish line, with Frenchman
Lucien Petit-Breton taking victory.
The early editions set the precedent for the unpredictable
and grueling nature of Milano-Sanremo, a race that continues to deliver
surprises more than a century later.
Read also
Unlike the cobbled Monuments such as Paris-Roubaix and the
Tour of Flanders, Milano-Sanremo lacks the brutal terrain that characterizes
those races. Instead, its difficulty lies in its sheer length. At nearly 300 kilometres,
it is the longest professional race on the calendar, demanding exceptional
endurance and tactical endurance too.
The route is largely flat in the first half, lulling riders
into a false sense of security before the real challenges emerge in the final
50 kilometres.
One of the most iconic features of Milano-Sanremo is the
Passo del Turchino, a climb that once played a decisive role in the race but
has since become more of a symbolic passage. The climb traditionally marks the
transition from the cold and often grey conditions of Lombardy to the bright,
picturesque Ligurian coastline. It was here, in the early years of the race,
that decisive attacks often went clear, but as cycling has evolved, its role
has diminished.

Tadej Pogacar his yet to have conquered Milano-Sanremo
The modern-day selection process typically begins with the
three "Capi", Capo Mele, Capo Cervo, and Capo Berta. While not
particularly steep or long, these climbs serve to soften the legs and eliminate
those who are not in peak condition. Riders who struggle with positioning or
find themselves too far back often burn crucial energy trying to stay in
contention.
The real battle, however, begins with the Cipressa, a
5.6-kilometer climb averaging 4% that was introduced in 1982 to make the finale
more selective. While it rarely produces a winning move, it does serve to
whittle down the peloton and set the stage for the race-defining Poggio di
Sanremo.
The Poggio, just 3.7 kilometres long, may seem unremarkable
on paper, but its placement so close to the finish makes it one of the most
critical points of any race. Introduced in 1960, the climb is often where
attackers launch their bids for glory, hoping to distance the sprinters before
the final descent into Sanremo.
Read also
This final stretch, a technical descent off the Poggio, has
played a decisive role in many editions of the race. Riders who can handle
their bikes at high speed gain an advantage here, with the descent often
proving just as crucial as the climb itself. The race then flattens out for the
last two kilometres, leading into a thrilling finale on the Via Roma, Sanremo's
famous finishing straight.
Legends of Milano-Sanremo
Over the years, Milano-Sanremo has produced some of the most
legendary moments in cycling history. Costante Girardengo dominated the race in
the early 20th century, winning six times between 1918 and 1928, cementing his
place as one of Italy's greatest cycling icons. The 1946 edition remains one of
the most celebrated, as Fausto Coppi launched an audacious attack after just 5km
and finished 14 minutes ahead of Lucien Teisseire to claim victory in a
performance that symbolised Italy's post-war resilience.
Perhaps no rider has left a greater mark on Milano-Sanremo
than Eddy Merckx. The Belgian superstar won the race a record seven times
between 1966 and 1976, showcasing his ability to win in a variety of ways, whether
in solo attacks, small breakaways, or bunch sprints. His victories cemented
Milaon-Sanremo as a race where both classics specialists and all-rounders could
thrive.

Jasper Philipsen won the most recent edition in 2024
In more recent history, the unpredictability of
Milan-Sanremo has been on full display. In 2008, Fabian Cancellara stunned the
peloton with a perfectly timed attack in the final kilometres, using his time trailing
ability to hold off the chasers. In 2017, Peter Sagan, Michał Kwiatkowski, and
Julian Alaphilippe engaged in a breathtaking three-man sprint, with Kwiatkowski
edging out Sagan by mere millimetres. The drama of the race continues to
captivate cycling fans, proving that despite the seemingly straightforward
course, Milano-Sanremo is anything but predictable.
One of the unique aspects of Milan-Sanremo is its ability to
accommodate a wide range of riders. Pure sprinters like Mark Cavendish, who won
in 2009, have found success when the race comes down to a bunch kick, while
aggressive attackers like Vincenzo Nibali, who triumphed in 2018 with a daring
solo move on the Poggio, have also had their moments of glory.
This dual nature
of the race means that no single style of rider has a guaranteed advantage,
making it one of the most exciting and open contests in cycling. If both sprinters and climbers can win, it’s certainly a
race that no one wants to miss.
Read also
The strategic element of Milan-Sanremo is what makes it so
compelling. Unlike the Tour of Flanders or Paris-Roubaix, where the strongest
riders often win through sheer power, Milano-Sanremo requires a perfect balance
of patience and opportunism. Attacking too early can lead to heartbreak, while
waiting too long can leave a rider without options. Every decision in the final
kilometres is magnified, making for a thrilling spectacle where race craft is
just as important as physical strength.
As cycling continues to evolve, so does Milano-Sanremo. The
race has experimented with additional climbs, such as the Le Manie ascent, in
an attempt to make thins more difficult for sprinters, but its core identity
remains unchanged. The tension that builds over nearly 300 kilometres,
culminating in a frantic and unpredictable finale, ensures that Milano-Sanremo
will continue to be one of the most anticipated races of the season.
Read also
Looking ahead to future editions, Milano-Sanremo remains a
coveted prize for riders of all disciplines. For sprinters, it represents one
of the few opportunities to win a Monument. For classics specialists, it offers
a rare chance to battle head-to-head with the fastest men in the world. And for
fans, it is a spectacle that never fails to deliver drama, proving year after
year why it is one of the most beloved races in cycling.
Milan-Sanremo is more than just a race; it is a celebration
of cycling itself. Its history, unpredictability, and ability to crown a wide
variety of champions make it a truly unique event. As long as there are
cyclists willing to push themselves to the limit, La Primavera will remain one
of the sport’s most cherished traditions, ushering in the new season with
excitement, beauty, and unforgettable moments.
Its charm lies in the unknown, the tension-filled moments
leading up to the Poggio, the chaotic descents, and the final stretch where
victory is decided in a matter of seconds. That is the magic of Milano-Sanremo:
a race that has stood the test of time and continues to deliver unforgettable
moments, year after year.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









