
In two days' time Primoz Roglic will be starting the Giro d'Italia and will be doing so as one of the two main favourites to wear the pink jersey in Rome. However in the back of his mind the Tour de France continues to be present as the priority for 2025 - and the Slovenian may be trying to attempt the same plan and preparation as Tadej Pogacar did in 2024.
Without a doubt, the Giro is the Grand Tour Roglic can most realistically win this year, and he starts with a full-focused squad backing him up including Jai Hindley, Daniel Martínez and Giulio Pellizzari - all men with great reputation in the Corsa Rosa. Still, Roglic's coach Marc Lamberts talked honestly about his goals, preparation and what has changed in the past few years, and shares some very interesting insight on the veteran.
Sign
up here and create your Fantasy Giro d’Italia budget team - $9100/€8,000/£6,800
in Prizes!
"Even more, in his own mind the Tour de France is still the main goal. That is the only race he has not yet won," Lamberts told Wielerflits. "In addition, the team was in favor of doing the Giro. Primoz himself made the decision to go for the Giro and Tour. We talked about it for a long time, but I honestly was not in favor of it." At the end of the day it was the decision that was made, and Roglic arrives at the Giro with few race days but a very inspiring performance at the Volta a Catalunya.
Read also
In Lamberts' mind, the Giro-Vuelta would've been the most logic option, taking into consideration how well the Spanish Grand Tour suits his abilities. "He always pedals his best values there and has not won there four times for nothing. He finds steeper, short climbs of twenty to thirty minutes there. That suits him a lot better than the Tour and Giro, where you sometimes get climbs of an hour or longer thrown in front of the wheels that are more climbers.
But Roglic is looking for new challenges, and the desire to win the Tour de France is still alive after all these years. "If you have won the Vuelta four times and the Giro once, but not that one race, then it is a legitimate choice to go for the Tour - as long as he can still sit on the bike. Maybe even against his better judgment. And I can follow him in that."
Read also
The Slovenian is now 35 years old but it can be realistically argued that he is still riding his very best numbers - above those that almost got him the Tour de France win in 2020. This comes as a result of many changes in training over recent years, specially targeting his weak points.
"He wants to work towards his main goals as well as possible and that has to be done via those altitude training camps. At home you can't get him as good as he used to. Then he no longer reaches his highest level," he admits. "On the other hand, Primoz is also a family man, who has a family with two small children, who he wants to take care of when he is at home. He is already away so much."
"In 2025, racing will be different. If he still had the same profile as five years ago, I don't think he would still be riding in the top 5 in the Grand Tour," Lamberts interestingly adds. "But his training has been adjusted, with more 'durability' and 'fatigue resistance', at the expense of explosiveness. That was necessary, if they always start attacking 50 to 60 kilometers from the end and just keep going."
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









