Preview. The opening two days of the Tour of Guangxi proved profitable for the sprinters but the situation will be different on stage 3. The fight for the overall classification will begin and the circuit in Nanning can be decisive for the outcome of the race.
Stage 3 features a five-lap circuit in Nanning. 134 kilometers in distance, it is the most explosive stage and only one that can actually see differences from far away. Certainly riders will save their legs for the final ascent as all roads inbetween are pan-flat.
Stage 3: Nanning - Nanning, 134.8 kilometers
However the ascent is 1.4 kilometers long at 11.5%, this is hard enough to make differences, create splits. The climb ends with 19.5 kilometers to go. There is space to reorganize afterwards, however it is an open day.
The Weather
Map Tour of Guangxi 2023 stage 3
A slight northeastern breeze. It won't impact the race, it could see a small headwind on the climb but the gradients and coverage will likely block it.
The Favourites
Attacks will certainly come. There are not many opportunities in this race to make the difference, and this is the steepest climb in the race and enough to get cracks. Climbers and puncheurs both have their chances. UAE have Felix Grossschartner and Tim Wellens and should be among the most likely to try and explode the race. Lightweights could perform here quite well, riders such as Jhonatan Narváez, Esteban Chaves and an in-form Sebastian Berwick could seize these gradients to shoot their shot.
However many more will be in the mix. After the climb as well of course, but when it comes to the uphill we should expect Matteo Jorgenson and Iván Sosa of Movistar, BORA with Max Schachmann and Frederik Wandahl, EF also have Hugh Carthy and Rigoberto Uran; and we've got further riders such as Cristian Rodríguez and Benjamin Thomas who could be very important cogs in the fight for the overall classification.
The stage may end in a sprint however. The climb is tough but let's not get ahead of ourselves, between the climbs there is not even a tiny hilltop, just a small descent and completely pan-flat roads. This means even if some sprinters lose time on the climb, an organized chase with some teams can definitely see the race bunch up once again - and in the final kilometers attacks don't really have chances of succeeding.
Hence the whole differences have to be made uphill and then for there to be good collaboration in front, to prevent a sprint. Specially when we've got riders such as Arnaud de Lie and Marijn van den Berg who can climb quite well and should not be far from the front in the summit. Ethan Hayter at his best should also, but it's uncertain however how he will ride. Then, depending on how much the race comes back together in the final minutes, you could also see fast men such as Jonathan Milan, Max Kanter, Tobias Lund Andresen and Amaury Capiot try to go for the win.
Prediction Tour of Guangxi 2023 stage 3:
*** Tim Wellens, Arnaud de Lie
** Marijn van den Berg, Feliz Grossschartner, Jhonatan Narváez
* Tobias Lund Andresen, Jonathan Milan, Ethan Hayter, Matteo Jorgenson, Max Schachmann, Hugh Carthy
** Marijn van den Berg, Feliz Grossschartner, Jhonatan Narváez
* Tobias Lund Andresen, Jonathan Milan, Ethan Hayter, Matteo Jorgenson, Max Schachmann, Hugh Carthy
Pick: Marijn van den Berg
Preview written by Rúben Silva.
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling forRafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
The winner of the 1st edition Tour of Guangxi @Tim_Wellens @TeamEmiratesUAE will be back in this year! The last UCI World Tour race of the season will on fire🔥🔥🔥 #tog2023🇨🇳 8 days to go!
Write a comment