Lance Armstrong's tremendous smackdown on Twitter for commenting on trans athletes: "A native male who cheated, I'm sure he'll fix it..."
Cycling
Amid an increasingly heated debate over the participation of trans women in women's sports competitions, tennis legend Martina Navratilova has openly expressed her opposition to the practice. The prominent sportswoman has criticized Lance Armstrong for sharing his opinion on the issue.
In recent times, there has been a growing debate about the inclusion of trans women in women's sports competitions. One of the main points of contention revolves around the alleged competitive advantage that trans women might have due to their biology and previous muscle development. Martina Navratilova has expressed concern about this issue and has argued that cis women may be at a disadvantage to trans women in terms of strength and physical performance.
Read also
Lance Armstrong's opinion
Lance Armstrong, the former professional cyclist who was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles due to doping cases, has also shared his opinion on the participation of trans athletes in sport. Armstrong raised the question of whether it is possible to support the transgender community and, at the same time, question the fairness of trans athletes in competitions without being labeled as transphobic or bigoted. While his point of view is focused on finding answers, his comments have generated even more controversy on this sensitive topic.
"Of all the controversial and polarizing issues out there today, I'm not sure there are any as hot as trans athletes in sport," he wrote, hence putting the subject in the spotlight even further. "Isn't there a world where you can support the transgender community and be curious about the equity of transgender athletes in sport without being labeled transphobic or bigoted for asking questions? Do we already know the answers? And do we want to know them?"
Read also
Navratilova's response
Martina Navratilova, known for her outspokenness and activism in defense of equality, did not bite her tongue in responding to Armstrong's comments. The tennis player pointed out the irony of a man who cheated in sport now speaking out about others' participation in women's sporting competitions. Her response, while direct, reflects her firm belief that there is a competitive disadvantage and that the inclusion of trans women in women's sports is neither fair nor equitable.
Navratilova's wrote: "A native male who cheated in sport is going to talk to a natal male to talk about other native males competing in native female sports. Got it. I'm sure Lance will fix it."
Read also
Importantly, Martina Navratilova has made it clear that she has no problem with trans people per se. Her objection centers on the competitive advantage trans women may have due to biological and muscular factors. As an athlete and a woman, Navratilova advocates for equity and fairness in sport and argues that allowing trans women to compete in women's categories could undermine the fundamental principles of fair competition and sportsmanship.
Read also


Juan LarraCycling Journalist
Juan Larra is a writer for Cyclinguptodate and editor-in-chief of Ciclismoaldia, where he has played a central role since its inception. Under his leadership, the website has become a trusted source for professional cycling coverage, offering in-depth analysis, news, and feature stories.
A sports journalist with over 20 years of experience, Juan earned his degree in Journalism from the University of Seville in 2007. He began his career covering a wide range of sports—including football, basketball, Formula 1, MotoGP, tennis, and cycling—for platforms such as the official La Liga app, Vodafone and Movistar websites, NBA Blogdebasket, and Cadena Cope, honing his skills in writing and editorial management.
In addition to his work at Ciclismoaldia, Juan contributes to Cyclinguptodate and serves as editor-in-chief for the tennis-focused site Tenisaldia. Throughout his career, he has conducted exclusive interviews with cyclists and sports figures, provided detailed analysis of competitions ranging from local Spanish races to major international events, and acted as a special correspondent at prestigious races including Paris-Roubaix, the Tour de France, and the Vuelta a España.
Juan’s combination of experience, expertise, and direct access to athletes has established him—and the platforms he leads—as authoritative voices in professional cycling.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







