"If you ignore the World Championship because of your spring campaign on the road, why are you racing cross in the winter?" - Lars Boom blasts Pidcock's decision to skip World Championship defence
Cyclocross
After it was announced that Tom Pidcock will not be defending his Cyclocross World Championship title in Hoogerheide at the beginning of February, a number of former champions have spoken out against the decision.
2008 World Champion, Lars Boom questioned Pidcock's choice to priotise the spring classics in an interview with Wielerflits. "A crosser like Tom Pidcock belongs at the World Championship," Boom says. "It would have been very nice if he had been there. If you ignore the World Cup because of your spring campaign on the road, why are you racing cross in the winter as a road racer?"
In the same interview, Richard Groenendaal and Erwin Vervecken both shared their thoughts. "Is he hesitating because he does not want to be beaten directly by those men and thus have to give up his title?" Groenendaal questions. "Pidcock is part of it as the outgoing world champion. I think you should take up the gauntlet."
Whilst Vervecken tries to play devil's advocate. "To win that World Cup… Of the big three ( Mathieu van der Poel , Wout van Aert and Pidcock, ed.) On paper, he has the fewest chances of winning there in Hoogerheide," he says. "Wout is also the defending champion at the Belgian championship, but he also skips that.”
As Boom theories, could cyclocross's big three soon become a duo as Pidcock focuses more and more on his burgeoning road career? "Olympic mountain biking champion, a Tour de France ride on Alpe d'Huez… He has some very nice outliers. But on some courses in the cross Tom can't compete yet. Sometimes he does, but then he makes mistakes – like in that last mud strip in Diegem. That is the difference."
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- they can sign any 100 of top riders today but Pogi will win over Remco any time at the TDF unless something goes wrongabstractengineer10-11-2026
- the time for a GC rider to retire is when they cannot win stages, or have a significant level drop like from winner/podium into top 5/10 consistently. Roglic is still competitive and Froome raced even though he became pack fodder.abstractengineer10-11-2026
- He should be in a different team. It was detrimental. For them it does not matter if he does not develop. He should have gone to a team where they need him to succeed.abstractengineer10-11-2026
- Technically it is "strictly forbidden to deviate from the lane they selected when launching into the sprint and, in so doing, endangering others". But: 1. Marie did not endangered anyone. 2. Above rule 2.3.036 is a Road Cycling rule not CX. 3. In Cyclocross we have only not well defined "irregular sprint" without description what would that mean. But even if you use 2.3.036 for CX it is still wrongly applied rule.averagecyclist10-11-2026
- Technically, leedorney is correct. There was a deviation. It was just a very questionable call to disqualify Marie from the victory, especially since she most likely would have won regardless of it..
santiagobenites10-11-2026 - You're WRONG!!! ... Capish?PogiSloFans10-11-2026
- ALBERTO CONTADOR isn't the only former cycling star who is praising Pogačar as the "greatest rider in history." EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history... not statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans10-11-2026
- No org will admit fault until the evidence in overwhelming and not even then. They have protected abusers and criminals.abstractengineer10-11-2026
- Schreiber won. UCI please admit your fault and correct result.averagecyclist10-11-2026
- She deviated from her line - end of
leedorney10-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment