Thijs Zonneveld can't understand why French teams didn't pull out of Etoile de Besseges: "The bigger French teams should've certainly taken more responsibility in this"
Cycling
Last week's Etoile de Besseges was the topic of discussions for all the wrong reasons. Of the 146 men at the start of the race last Wednesday, only 52 finished on Sunday with most abandoning over safety concerns. The third and fourth stages were stopped and shortened several times either for weather reasons or due to cars suddenly appearing on the course.
In principle, only French teams (except Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale) and few riders from Belgian teams (who left the choice to continue up to the riders themselves) finished the race. "As far as I'm concerned, you start to lose the right to say anything about safety, if you send your own riders over a course that the organization can't guarantee to be closed to cars," Thijs Zonneveld analyzes in the In het Wiel podcast.
Read also
According to Zonneveld, there was one correct decision to be made by the managers. Getting out was the only option. "If you saw what happened... Twice a car went straight into the peloton and a few times they were on the side of the road. I'm not entirely happy with the past few days, no."
Almost all the big foreign teams dropped out of the race. "But all the French teams just keep going... Those French teams are often the problem. These are recurring things, they are often the breakers of the strike. The bigger French teams should certainly have taken more responsibility in this, I think."
Zonneveld, who has been the sporting director of continental BEAT Cycling since this season, would've pulled his team out of the race himself. "The safety of the riders comes first. I would also really blame myself if we as a team say that we are going to continue riding and then someone gets hit by a car the next day. Then you can't look at yourself in the mirror anymore? Then no invitation a year later, you know."
Another thing Zonneveld is also not happy about: the absence of the UCI in this discussion. "It was very ugly that one half of the peloton steps down and the other half continues. And of course that the UCI also withdraws itself... They simply do not take a position. Riders get a yellow or red card if they do something wrong. And what are we going to do with this organization that lets cars drive on the course? Nothing. It is an idiotic signal that you give as a UCI. They are choosing the side of the organization again."
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









