"That is super dangerous!" - More riders and experts criticize UCI's experiments of racing without radio
Cycling
The UCI's experiments to reduce the importance of earphones are increasingly met with resistance from both riders and stakeholders. Richard Plugge's statement was countered by UCI boss David Lappartient. In the meantime, more and more voices seem to find agreement with Plugge's words, while Lappartient is in the line of fire of all experts.
Ramon Sinkeldam, who is currently racing at the Tour de Pologne where the tests are being carried out, stood out to point out the importance of radio communication via X. "Yesterday, there were team cars, ambulances and jury cars in a blind spot after a fall. How are we as riders supposed to know that all these vehicles are there?" he began his story about the lack of information.
Read also
"And what if we want to call the team with one of the riders, how are the others supposed to know who is bringing a water bottle or something to eat, or who is providing assistance? Do we have to look back all the time as riders without earphones, 25 times, a hundred meters back, to see exactly which car belongs to whom? That is super dangerous!" was his clear statement. Sinkeldam then pleaded for one neutral jury channel, if the earphones really were to disappear.
He is supported by Dutch pundit Stef Clement who spoke at NOS: "With this experiment, the UCI assumes that riders can always reach each other, but that is not possible during a busy race. Certainly not during a mountain stage, when riders and team cars are everywhere and nowhere. With this, the UCI is once again shifting responsibility. If only they would first concern themselves with safety regulations regarding the course. The fact that the UCI wants to experiment at the Tour de Pologne is almost worse than irony," he refers to numerous (safety-related) incidents at the Poland's only World Tour event.
"What progress have we made after those terrible crashes? Absolutely nothing."
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Pidcock finished 9th place, 29 minutes down. he is a helluva rider, so gutsy. and he is amazing at all disciplines. but this headline is . . .mij09-11-2026
- I know, watch the video. and listen to her competitors. it was a tricky tacky call at best. WTF is this guy talking about??? my original comment was from the picture it didn't look like anything.mij09-11-2026
- I dunno what you're talking about. you make no sense. MS's competitor and the competitors coach said it was BS. she didn't deviate in a way that relegation should be required. revel LOL. you're so cool, in your own mind.mij09-11-2026
- deviation lol, watch the videomij09-11-2026
- the 'No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines' comment was unfortunately a bit off. didn't you just boast about your principles in the comments section of another article?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









