SCANDAL! British team investigated for use of Chinese bike frames with fake UCI-approval stickers
Cycling
Would you believe it? One of the Continental teams was bold enough to try to fool UCI by riding on unapproved bike frames from China equipped with fake approval stickers. The misconduct of British formation Saint Piran from the 2022 season will now be investigated and likely penalized with a hefty fine. Saint Piran is the last standing British conti team (with Trinity likely to close down) and a heavy fine wouldn't help the complicated financial situation of British teams at all.
"The UCI can confirm that an investigation is currently underway regarding the potential use of a non-homologated frameset by UCI Continental team Saint Piran in past events on the UCI International Calendar," a UCI spokesperson said. "As the investigation is ongoing, the UCI will refrain from making any further comments at this time."
The UCI has strict rules regarding its approval process for framesets and the use of the compliance label. Regulations make clear that "the fixing of the UCI frameset and UCI fork labels by private individuals is forbidden" and that labels must be "visible, indelible and inseparable from the frameset".
The regulations also state that "any misuse of the label or use contrary to the provisions of this protocol may be penalised by a fine of between CHF 10,000 and 100,000."
Read also
Saint Piran’s boss, Richard Pascoe, said on Wednesday: "After a detailed inspection, we can confirm the unbranded frames were not compliant with the UCI regulation process." In a statement, he added: "Saint Piran acted on the advice of the manufacturer and an external expert and understood they were in line with UCI regulations at all times. It appears that advice was incorrect. We have now reported this to the UCI and will abide by their ruling."
According to Cycling Weekly, multiple sources reported that they feared the framesets were not legal and unsafe. Team personnel are said to have challenged Pascoe on the matter at the time. A document produced by riders underlined various safety concerns with the frames, but it is understood that the concerns were brushed aside with riders later accused of "moaning".
A spokesperson for British Cycling shared the following update with Cycling Weekly on Thursday: "We are aware of the matter and will investigate through our compliance process."
More like corner cutting, I doubt there is any advantage in terms of performance. Cost saving, perhaps?
I suppose you could argue that the performance advantage comes in money they now have to spend elsewhere, say rider contracts, that their competitors don't have, giving them an unfair advantage.
I'm pretty sure that the decision to use these bikes had everything to do with cost savings, as Saint Piran is a relatively low budget team. The irony is that the team will most likely be hit with a stiff financial penalty by the UCI, negating whatever money they saved by making the poor decision to go this route.
Why only focus on the financial side? If you read the article, safety concerns were voiced by many from the outset. It’s basically like forcing taxi drivers or pilots to drive cars/ fly planes that aren’t certified and I’m sure that would become national news, not stay hidden in the lost corners of online bike forums. But, to reconsider costs separately, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was decided in knowledge of a worse than admitted financial situation in the hope they could turn things around but without thought for consequences, i.e. top brass knew a while ago salaries and more were at risk but swept things under the carpet, just like a modern business feels is normal in today’s world.
@Sweep Maybe, why not. Considering you can get UCI approved bikes for under 1500€ there really was no excuse cause the difference in performance isn’t that great that a rider can notice what he’s riding on.
Just in
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Popular news
Latest comments
- Releasing data doesnt solve the issue of credibilty. Because what ended to be is people making intepretation of the data which leads to innuendo. If he really want to improve his team why don't he just ask UAE of Visma to show them what do they do to their team? I feel sorry for anyone who was born after the doping era carrying the sins of the past. Their hard work and achievement always viewed as suspicious. I'm glad I'm not a pro cyclist so I don't need to keep proofing my innocent everytime I'm doing something remarkable.jelantik10-04-2025
- In every sport, records are broken and more-performing athletes emerge every year. And no one questions them. It's sad that certain people INSIDE the cycling are the first to create and increase suspicions about the sport they claim to love . And they do it without any prove, driven by frustration and envy, because they're always the losers to throw shit at their sport. It's never Vingegaard or Van der Poel; it's always the losers who act this way. Shameful. (sorry for my bad english)
maria2024202410-04-2025 - It's kinda crazy that people who make a living in professional sport don't understand how competition works. You have the sport. You have pharmaceuticals which may improve performance. You test for as many as you can. If you pass the tests, you keep your result. It's only in cycling that a substantial minority think that all results should be provisional for 15 years. In nearly every other sport, people watch and enjoy what they see, or if they don't like what goes into producing what they see, they don't watch.
Barney10-04-2025 - It is pretty cool that a Grand Tour rider is even riding Paris-Roubaix, much less in the discussion for a podium. This is a throwback across many generations of cyclists to the pillars of Hinault and Merckx. Enjoy it while it lasts.Barney10-04-2025
- Sounds like a witch hunt! " And then we should keep the samples of his tests for the next 10 years, when scientific research will have made further progress," he concluded." Throwing shit on the wall and see what sticks...drkesterdmd09-04-2025
- This video is weird, the more you look at it the more it seems as if riders vanished. At one point it looks like about 20 riders are going down and the next moment it’s only a dozen or so on the road even though the number of bikes also seems more.Mistermaumau09-04-2025
- I'm waiting the update 3.maria2024202409-04-2025
- Didn't I just read that Boonen predicted MVdP was going to win Flanders? I don't pay attention to anything but the actual race.
ScottG09-04-2025 - At least they rectified their mistake. Better to be fair than to be absolute.ScottG09-04-2025
- " I do not want to insinuate doubts, but.." Oldest backhanded comment in the books. It's not Pog's fault that all the French riders are currently crap.ScottG09-04-2025