Since the controversial conclusion to the race, as the much reduced peloton continued on without half the teams who had started, rider safety and how to improve things have been a hot topic of conversation. For Aldag though, the topic is a very nuanced one. “It’s a very difficult issue because you can’t just take one position. You have to balance your thoughts on the situation,” he explains. “I think everyone agrees that none of the parties involved would say they don’t care about safety.”
“For teams, there’s a human concern, but also a business one. No team wants to pay a rider €20,000 a day while they’re sidelined with an injury that could have been prevented,” Aldag adds. “No rider wants to end up in a ditch with broken bones. And no race organizer wants their event to be remembered for safety issues. And for the
UCI, it’s not good for the sport if the main discussions are about races being stopped due to oncoming traffic.”
Nevertheless, something does need to be done though Aldag concedes. “We all have the same interests, we just need to align them while recognizing the limitations. How much are riders being pushed by teams? How do relegation pressures impact decision-making? And how far will riders go in pursuit of results and contracts? There’s also the internal discussion about respect in the peloton,” he notes. “I think we all agree that there shouldn’t be cars coming in the opposite direction, that’s obvious. No organizer would argue otherwise. It’s not a video game where you get seven lives. From my own experience, having broken almost everything except my left leg in my career, I know how much it hurts, how long it takes to recover, and the mental toll it takes to come back.”
“So, what’s the solution? There’s no easy one, but we need to have these discussions in the proper settings, not just blow them up in public debates that hurt everyone involved,” Aldag concludes. “No one looks good in that.”