Latest comments
- He's an idiot
- He was in amazing shape in the Tour 2024, 3 months after the crash, but in P-N 2026 that same crash is a reason why he wasn't very good? Don't make a fool out of yourself
- You need to understand that these sort of articles are there to draw you in. It's commonly known as clickbait.
- Agree. Horner is an old fart who doesn't understand how racing works these days. Oh, and his biases extend to Isaac del Toro, apparently
- Cyclinguptodate should stop citing Horner as a source when it comes to anything regarding vdP. Horner clearly has a bias against Mathieu, he really does not like him. I wonder if Horner and Adrie had some issue back in the days.
- Atheism is a religion.
Fight me! (Given the article, I mean this metaphorically.)
- Given the way many of the loudest ones are acting, I can't really blame you for that.
And I'm more annoyed at them than you are.
-A Christian
- agree, Philipsen is no longer the best sprinter...
- Alpecin-deceuninck, for Milano-Sanremo, don't have a key tactical peg in Philipsen. He's no longer unbeatable in the reduced bunch sprint at the end of Milano-Sanremo. Matthew Brennan will absorb the climbs better and is faster than him. Alpecin-deceuninck can't rely on him for that reason - if they do, Visma can push the pace a bit more with van Aert and Laporte, pretty much guaranteeing victory for Brennan. Van der Poel must attack (well, he doesn't need to because Pogačar will), but if Pogačar backs off for some reason (which he won't), van der Poel'll have to attack.
- And you read that in my post?
I already asked you once: What's wrong with your head?
Loading