+0
14-09-2026 11:37
+3
14-09-2026 10:59
14-09-2026 10:43
07-09-2026 15:34
05-09-2026 16:47
+2
04-09-2026 18:51
+5
04-09-2026 18:43
+4
04-09-2026 17:46
04-09-2026 17:39
04-09-2026 15:02
Loading
+0
Cyclingsbestfan
Change the record.14-09-2026 11:37
+3
Cyclingsbestfan
I'm sorry to see him go. We need people who shake things up or things never change. This reminds me of how the UCI treated Graeme Obree (google the name younngsters) back in the day.14-09-2026 10:59
+0
Cyclingsbestfan
It is good news for cycling fans, but I doubt that the many peoples of the world that are put upon will even know about it.14-09-2026 10:43
+3
Cyclingsbestfan
Mas has never shown he is good in a TT. Roglic does have past form in that discipline. Mas is hot and he is a Spaniard in his home race, so he could surprise us. Is Roglic likely to make up the 2 minutes + he is behind? A minute at best perhaps? This TT is going to be intersting.07-09-2026 15:34
+3
Cyclingsbestfan
You will be missed. Enjoy!05-09-2026 16:47
+2
Cyclingsbestfan
So what do think can be done about the problem of cars getting on to the course?04-09-2026 18:51
+5
Cyclingsbestfan
UCI annual report shows historically-high "reserves" of CHF 76.1 million. They can afford it alright. I mean look at how much money the make from riders not having their socks pulled up to the right height. Your right somebody has to be paid to do that job.04-09-2026 18:43
+4
Cyclingsbestfan
I know that. I was waiting on MrM informing us. Regarding it not being worth collecting? The UCI could use that money to employ more marshals or buy a few more barriers and road closure notice boards.................04-09-2026 17:46
+4
Cyclingsbestfan
Somebody has boobed on the road closer. There should have been a barrier at every junction with the course. There should have been notices up and a marshal at every junction. This is down to the UCI not doing their job properly.04-09-2026 17:39
+4
Cyclingsbestfan
You are strange chap? What on earth are you talking about? You want analysis? The golden goose metaphor is perfectly (or figure of speech) if you prefer, is easy to understand in the context of UCI fines and a captive market. Further how would you possible know what I think on any topic? You extrapolate my supposed way of thinking from a simple post of mine? Do you consider yourself to be some sort of mind reader? It's your clarity regarding a comment I'm trying to understand. It was a simple question that you failed to answer, Now we have all this stupid obfuscation from you. Answer the question or ignore it, but don’t post nonsense that just makes you look silly. The comment question on your post still stands unanswered. You said "It doesn’t even pay the paper it’s sent on.". i said "You've lost me there? You would need to explain your thinking (meaning) on that comment?"04-09-2026 15:02