Frans Maassen, now a respected sports director at Team Visma
| Lease a Bike, has opened up about the personal toll of professional cycling’s
EPO era in the 1990s, a period that drove him out of the sport at just 30 years
old.
Maassen, who won the Amstel Gold Race in 1991 and was tipped
for a glittering career, found himself increasingly outmatched as
performance-enhancing drugs transformed the peloton. While others surged ahead,
Maassen stood still, by choice.
“I could never understand how it could make such a
difference—how EPO could make you so much stronger,” he said on the In de
Waaier podcast. “We don't have to be so spasmodic about it now as we did
back then. But it was just used a lot in the peloton.”
His recollections are not of a sudden collapse, but of a
slow erosion. One day in particular stood out. “I remember thinking I was
better than ever—and I probably was. But at the Drielandenpunt I was simply
outpaced by more than 100 riders. And we were only halfway there.”
Maassen’s hematocrit levels hovered at 44 or 45, just under
the 50% threshold later used as an EPO detection marker. But as rivals pushed
far beyond it, the sport splintered. “You suddenly had two speeds in cycling,”
he said. “That was very difficult for me, because I didn't win any prizes
anymore. And that was always my drive—to be able to suffer.”
The loss of competitiveness wasn’t just a professional
crisis. It cut to the heart of his identity. “At one point a spring broke. I
earned quite a lot of money at that time, but I was never able to enjoy it,” he
admitted. “If you are paid as a leader and you can't live up to that, then you
really feel like crap. Those were definitely difficult years. But that wasn't
just true for me. It was a very difficult time for a lot of riders.”
Just about the entire peloton during the 90s were using
performance enhancing drugs, but Maassen managed not to, and that should be applauded,
especially considering the sport is still recovering from the dark cloud caused
by that era.
Asked whether he had ever considered doping, Maassen did not
flinch. “I have thought about it, yes. I dare say that I came close to doing
so. But something held me back, and I am very happy about that now.”
I wonder, do the former riders who didn’t use ever talk about it with the former riders who did use, and what gets said during those moments? He’s still in the sport, the team he’s on is the inheritor of the Rabobank machine, there are many there who were using the illegal and destructive tools. Don’t talk about the past, I want to know about the now, as well!
There are plenty of examples of that. Phillippe Casado with Lemond/Boyer; Bassons and many teammates/competitors/staff; Tyler Hamilton and Dr Celaya; Scott Mercier, etc.
Men tend not to talk much ;-)
It’s like with the men/women age gap, no matter what your position is on the older man/young woman and/or older women/young man, you only ever see articles about it by women (who then claim they’ve seen what men say about it even though when you search for that you come up with very little. I think the only conversations you’ll get to know about are those with dopers who came out the closet, how many are still stuck in one?