The calls for improved safety of cycling races have become loud and clear over the past 12 months and both UCI and race organizers are doing their best to satisfy the demands. Yet Sep Vanmarcke is not very content with the decision to remove Kanarieberg from the Dwars doors Vlaanderen course just because of last year's mass crash that involved Wout Van Aert among others.
"Nothing has ever happened on the Kanarieberg that was decisive for the race," he said at Sporza Daily. He believes the importance of this sector is simply overexaggerated while the center of the race lies elsewhere: "On the Oude Kwaremont, it was. You have to be at the front there."
On the security side of things, he is please with the work of organizers in Belgium: "Cycling is a dangerous sport and we can be proud of how we approach it in our country. Every race here is extremely well-secured. They can learn something from this abroad. But in the crash in Dwars door Vlaanderen it was simply a situation where the wheel was tapped and that will happen again," says Vanmarcke.
Rather than change the courses, the Belgian would like into the behaviour in peloton and the way riders approach racing. "It is too easy to always nag the organizers from the sidelines. And it is also too easy to always point the finger at the UCI," believes the former podium-finisher at Tour of Flanders.
"I can certainly list 5 things that could improve the problem. Next month I have a meeting with the UCI where I can discuss my ideas. I don't know if they will do anything about it, but then I will have done everything myself," says Vanmarcke.
"You're not allowed to look at your phone in the car, while riders are constantly staring at that screen on their bike in front of them. You're looking at the route on that screen, but you miss a colleague's manoeuvre. People even fall on the climb because they're looking at the wattages and the screen on a climb. Only show kilometres and time there," he thinks out loud.