PREVIEW | Critérium du Dauphiné 2023 stage 2 - Punchy finish to test GC riders and provide opportunity for classics riders
Cycling
Preview. After a thrilling start to the Criterium du Dauphiné, stage 2 should provide another classics-like finale. It will be a hilly day with an uphill finish that is expected to be quite explosive.
Stage 2 sees another hilly day, most of it at around 1000 meters with a lot of rolling roads. It's another grueling day, without any serious climbing but packed with small ascents and rolling roads. A day for breakaways or classics riders to succeed, with the GC contenders also having to pay serious attention or even chase bonifications. The day sees climbing start early on, and then it follows a consistent pattern of small and big-ring ascents.
Estimated start and finish times for Criterium du Dauphiné stage 2: 12:40-16:25CET
Stage 2: Brassac-les-Mines - La Chaise-Dieu, 168.5 kilometers
As is the case on the opening day, the finale also takes place in a hilly final circuit. This time around the final kilometers are uphill however. With 10.5 summits a 1Km climb at 7.5% which is categorized, a small descent then follows before the uphill drag into La Chaise-Dieu.
Although not categorized, it is a hilltop finish. 4.7 kilometers at 3%, hard enough to make some selection, but easy enough to see some fast men resist. It's an ascent with several restbite sections, but that also means the uphill sections are much steeper then the average, but 7% won't be scaring everyone. The final 500 meters flatten out, and this does favour those with the raw power when it comes to sprinting.
La Chaise-Dieu: 4.7Km; 3%
Stage 2 Finale
The Weather
Map Criterium du Dauphiné 2023 stage 2
There could be wet roads again. Rain is possible but not certain throughout the afternoon, however today has seen quite a lot of rain, it can be tricky conditions but a day where the finale is far from the same danger.
The Favourites
Christophe Laporte - Laporte was the man to beat today, and he showed the legs that were expected of him. Someone who has great form without the need for racing, he clearly showed the climbing legs today and a very strong sprint. This is a more difficult finale, but simultaneously I think he has more he could have given. He'll be my main car once again.
Matteo Trentin - Trentin has over the years not shown his explosivity, however today he looked quite good. A puncheur now, he still has a fast finish, having been second to Laporte he could aim to win for the first time this year.
Julian Alaphilippe - The final few meters will be hard, but Soudal - Quick-Step have the chance to make the finale very hard with Andrea Bagioli. Alaphilippe can certainly attack, but if he has good form - which has not yet been discovered - a sprint could also see the Frenchman succeed.
A sprint ends up likely, the final climb will be a gradual rise of pace but on these gradients only with some luck or a brutal attack on the final kilometers can someone succeed. Axel Zingle looked quite good today, Maxim van Gils, Andrea Bagioli and Fred Wright were also among the finishers in the Top10 which could have - except for Wright - a more suiting finale. Tobias Johannessen and Greg van Avermaet could also make their way into the front.
The breakaway is much less likely to succeed on a day like this. Jumbo-Visma had a clear plan and made it work, this day will be easier to control. Even though some riders have lost time, there will be a few teams interested in a sprint or peloton finale. It will be a harder finale however. GC riders can attack but will most likely be directly covered. Some other in-form puncheurs/climbers could succeed in a finale like this such as Matteo Jorgenson, Robert Stannard, Clément Champoussin and Felix Grossschartner.
Prediction Criterium du Dauphiné 2023 stage 2:
*** Christophe Laporte, Matteo Trentin
** Axel Zingle, Julian Alaphilippe, Maxim van Gils
* Andrea Bagioli, Fred Wright, Tobias Johannessen, Richard Carapaz, Matteo Jorgenson, Giulio Ciccone
** Axel Zingle, Julian Alaphilippe, Maxim van Gils
* Andrea Bagioli, Fred Wright, Tobias Johannessen, Richard Carapaz, Matteo Jorgenson, Giulio Ciccone
Pick: Christophe Laporte
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- he is doing 460 watts for 35 min to achieve 7 w/kg with VO2 at 96 , just unreal numbers.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just do it, and put up with the consequencesJumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment