ANALYSIS: Take a look at these transfer hits and misses from recent years including Wout van Aert and Chris Froome
Cycling
Tom Pidcock’s move over the winter from the INEOS Grenadiers
to Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team has been one of the most talked-about aspects of the
off-season. And for good reason, considering the multi-talented British
superstar was supposedly the man to take over INEOS for the next decade, but
that relationship unravelled spectacularly in front of our eyes over the last
two seasons.
Now, just over a month into his debut season with his new
team, Pidcock has already won his first race at the AlUla Tour, firmly
establishing himself at the forefront of the peloton once again. His transfer
represents a high-risk, high-reward decision that so far appears to be paying
off spectacularly, of course we will have to wait to see how things go but for
now the signs suggest that Pidcock made the right move.
On that note, lets take a look at two successful transfers
from recent years, and two that did not live up to expectations.
Read also
Transfers gone right
Wout van Aert – Sniper Cycling BVBA to Jumbo-Visma (2019)
Although recent headlines surrounding Wout van Aert’s legal
battle with his former team cast a shadow over his 2018 exit from Sniper
Cycling BVBA, there is no denying that his transfer to Jumbo-Visma (now Team
Visma | Lease a Bike) has been one of the most successful in modern cycling
history. Since joining the team in 2019, Van Aert has won nine Tour de France
stages, the green jersey in 2022, three Vuelta a Espana stages, Milano-Sanremo
in 2020, Strade Bianche in 2020, Amstel Gold Race in 2021, and many other
classics. His versatility, from bunch sprints to mountain stages and time
trials, has made him an invaluable asset to the team.
One of his most iconic moments came during the 2021 Tour de
France, when he won Stage 11 by attacking on the last climb of Mont Ventoux, over
30 kilometres from the finish. Van Aert described it as "the best victory
of my career." He followed it up by winning Stage 20, a 30 kilometre
individual time trial, and then capped off the race with victory on the
Champs-Élysées in Stage 21. His dominance across a huge range of courses was
historic, and he became the first rider to win a mountain stage, a time trial,
and a bunch sprint in the same Tour since Bernard Hinault in 1979.
Read also
Van Aert has also been crucial in supporting Jonas
Vingegaard’s Tour de France victories in 2022 and 2023, proving to be one of
the most complete riders in the peloton. His transfer to Visma transformed him
from a cyclocross star into one of the most dominant and popular road racers of
his generation, and there’s still more chapter for van Aert to write.
Primoz Roglic – Jumbo-Visma to BORA-hansgrohe (2024)
Another recent transfer that appears to be paying off is
Primoz Roglic’s move from Visma to Red Bull – BORA - hansgrohe in 2024. After
an illustrious stint with Visma that saw him win the Vuelta a Espana three
times, the Giro d'Italia in 2023, and numerous prestigious one-week stage
races, Roglic found himself in a difficult position within the team, as Jonas
Vingegaard usurped the Slovenian and took over leadership duties at the Tour de
France.
Seeking a fresh start, Roglic joined BORA - hansgrohe as
their undisputed Grand Tour leader. Early signs suggest the move was the right
one, with Roglic already making a strong impression in 2024 by winning the
Vuelta a Espana for a fourth time and the Dauphine. Yes, Roglic may still be
cursed at the Tour de France after crashing out yet again in 2024, but there’s
no denying that the Slovenian got off to a good start with his new team. With a
team fully committed to his ambitions, many expect him to challenge for another
Grand Tour victory in 2025, proving that even for a rider at his level and his
age, the right transfer can reignite a career.
Read also
Transfers gone wrong
Chris Froome – INEOS Grenadiers to Israel-Premier Tech
(2021)
Few transfers in recent years have gone as badly as Chris
Froome’s move from Team Sky (later INEOS Grenadiers) to Israel-Premier Tech in
2021, in fact this is one of the worst transfers of all time. At his peak,
Froome was the most brilliant stage racer of his era, winning four Tour de
France titles, two Vuelta a Espana titles, and the 2018 Giro d’Italia. After
his 2018 Giro win, he made history as he held all three grand tour titles simultaneously.
However, a horrific crash in 2019 left him with multiple fractures, and by the
time he signed with Israel-Premier Tech, he was a shadow of his former self.
Despite the team’s hopes of reviving his career, Froome has
been unable to return to top form. Since joining, he has managed just one
top-10 finish in a WorldTour race and has struggled to keep pace in Grand
Tours. The move has been widely regarded as one of the worst transfers in
cycling history, and it feels like an eternity since we’ve seen Froome remotely
close to his best. In fact, come to think of it, the last time we saw a spark
of the real Froome was when he was defeated by Pidcock on Alpe d’Huez back in
2022, which turned out to be the high point of Pidcock’s time with INEOS.

Will 2025 be the last year we see Chris Froome in the peloton?
Nairo Quintana – Movistar Team to Arkéa-Samsic (2020)
Another high-profile move that ultimately failed to deliver
was Nairo Quintana’s transfer from Movistar Team to Arkéa-Samsic in 2020. Once
regarded as one of the best climbers in the world, Quintana had won the 2014
Giro d’Italia and the 2016 Vuelta a Espana, and finished on the podium at the
Tour de France on multiple occasions. However, his initial seven year spell at Movistar
became increasingly complicated, with leadership tensions and tactical
struggles holding him back.
Moving to Arkéa-Samsic was supposed to provide Quintana with
full team leadership and a renewed shot at Tour de France success. However,
while he initially showed promising form, including stage wins in warm up
races, his performances in Grand Tours declined significantly. Worse still, his
tenure ended in controversy when he was disqualified from the 2022 Tour de
France due to banned tramadol use, leaving a stain on his legacy and leading to
Arkéa-Samsic parting ways with him.
Read also
Transfers in cycling can make or break careers, and as Tom
Pidcock’s early success with Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team shows, a well-judged move
can transform a rider’s trajectory. Wout van Aert and Primoz Roglic (as well as
many others) provide modern examples of transfers that elevated careers to new
heights or revived stalling careers. Meanwhile, the struggles of Chris Froome
and Nairo Quintana highlight the risks involved in making a big move,
especially if the team dynamics don’t suit the rider.
While it is still early days, Pidcock’s transfer appears to
be a move in the right direction, especially if his early-season form is
anything to go by. Do you think Pidcock has made the right choice? And what are
some of the other transfers that have been make or break moments in riders
careers before?
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










