
In recent days, several reports have hinted that Jonas Vingegaard is already confirmed to ride the 2026 Giro d’Italia, a move which could mark his debut at the Corsa Rosa with the aim of completing the set of the three Grand Tours, joining a historic elite that includes Eddy Merckx, Alberto Contador, and Bernard Hinault. However
Those reports indicate there is already an agreement with organizer RCS for the Dane to make his Giro debut in May 2026 as part of his season schedule. The decision looks rather obvious and has been heavily hinted at since the Dane's victory at the 2025 Vuelta a España.
At first glance, the idea that Vingegaard will target the Giro d’Italia — the only Grand Tour missing after he won the Tour de France in 2022 and 2023 and the Vuelta a España in 2025 — seems a natural sporting ambition. However, from a strategic standpoint in preparing for the 2026 Tour de France and in direct rivalry with Tadej Pogacar, this choice looks like a mistake.
My argument rests on what has happened in recent years as both riders shaped their season calendars around cycling’s biggest goal, the Tour de France. To assess it, we need to separate performance strategy from simple palmarès ambition.
In 2022 and 2023, Vingegaard won the Tour de France in back-to-back editions, establishing himself as one of the peloton’s premier Grand Tour rider and, on paper, the benchmark to beat. In 2023 in particular, he controlled the race from early stages, dominated key aspects such as the stage 16 time trial, and displayed the form to distance Pogacar at decisive moments. Data published by ProCyclingStats confirms Vingegaard was superior across several parts of the race, including time trial performance and crucial mountain stages, when he arrived with Tour-specific preparation.

Jonas Vingegaard and Tadej Pogacar will clash again at the 2026 Tour de France
Read also
After those two victories, however, both riders’ trajectories shifted noticeably. In 2024, Pogacar opted to race the Giro d’Italia and the Tour de France in the same season and achieved the rare double, the first time since 1998 that a rider won both in a single year.
That Giro ahead of the Tour appears to have served as a targeted springboard for the Slovenian, albeit with the expected physical cost of racing a Grand Tour before July. At the same time, Vingegaard crashed at Itzulia Basque Country, a factor widely cited by analysts as compromising his Tour preparation and reducing his level against Pogacar in July.
The pattern repeated in 2025. After another season disrupted by physical issues and setbacks, Vingegaard did not reach the Tour start in ideal form. The outcome was another Pogacar victory at the Tour de France, this time by more than four minutes on GC, including several stage wins and dominant control of the race. The Guardian itself highlighted that Pogacar sealed his fourth Tour title with a performance marked by consistency and superiority in critical race moments.
Pogacar’s fatigue
One aspect that drew less attention in broader coverage was the clear fatigue Pogacar showed at the end of that 2025 Tour de France. According to specialist reports, and as he acknowledged after the final stage, the Slovenian finished the race deeply tired, physically and mentally, which is logical after three weeks of extraordinary effort on top of a punishing spring campaign fighting Mathieu van der Poel for several Monuments, a program he is set to repeat in 2026.
This is precisely the crux of my argument: if Vingegaard devoted 2026 to Tour-specific preparation, avoiding the toll of a Grand Tour like the Giro d’Italia, he could reach July better equipped to fight Pogacar head-to-head and, crucially, to exploit the fatigue the Slovenian will likely accumulate in chasing Flanders and Liège again and going after a first win at Sanremo and Roubaix.
Racing the Giro entails, physically and physiologically, three weeks of high-demand competition in the mountains, time trials, and constant tension. Even the world’s best pay for that load with extended recovery, calendar adjustments, and managing lingering niggles. In the context of a single, specific target like the Tour de France, that accumulation of kilometers and efforts can create a freshness deficit at the key moment: the final two weeks of July, when most Tours are decided.
Read also
By contrast, Pogacar has shown in recent seasons that he can tolerate intense calendars with multiple high-level spring objectives without compromising peak performance in July. His participation in major Classics, lead-up stage races, and extra efforts has not translated into a meaningful drop in Tour form, to the point of accumulating four titles and becoming a by-word for competitive consistency in modern cycling. That resilience to cumulative fatigue and his ability to race hard before the Tour without losing sharpness appear to give him a psychological and physical edge over rivals who must prioritize a single seasonal goal.
It is entirely understandable that completing victories in all three Grand Tours is a major sporting ambition. Winning the Giro d’Italia, Tour de France, and Vuelta a España places any rider in a rare historical bracket of versatility and exceptional strength. However, the strategic question is: does that maximize your chances of beating your main rival in the year’s most important race? For me, the answer is no.
If Vingegaard wants to defeat Pogacar in July 2026 at the Tour de France, his best chance would have been to design a season where specific preparation and load management were geared solely toward reaching the Tour in optimum condition, capitalizing on any physical weakness his rival showed the previous year. Instead, by choosing to race the Giro — an event that demands immense physical and mental resources just six weeks before the Grande Boucle — he is opting to dilute his realistic chances of delivering a higher performance in July.
Vingegaard at the Grand Tours
| Race | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
| Giro d’Italia | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tour de France | — | 2nd | 1st | 1st | 2nd | 2nd |
| Vuelta a España | 46th | — | — | 2nd | — | 1st |
Read also

Juan LarraCycling Journalist
Juan Larra is a writer for Cyclinguptodate and editor-in-chief of Ciclismoaldia, where he has played a central role since its inception. Under his leadership, the website has become a trusted source for professional cycling coverage, offering in-depth analysis, news, and feature stories.
A sports journalist with over 20 years of experience, Juan earned his degree in Journalism from the University of Seville in 2007. He began his career covering a wide range of sports—including football, basketball, Formula 1, MotoGP, tennis, and cycling—for platforms such as the official La Liga app, Vodafone and Movistar websites, NBA Blogdebasket, and Cadena Cope, honing his skills in writing and editorial management.
In addition to his work at Ciclismoaldia, Juan contributes to Cyclinguptodate and serves as editor-in-chief for the tennis-focused site Tenisaldia. Throughout his career, he has conducted exclusive interviews with cyclists and sports figures, provided detailed analysis of competitions ranging from local Spanish races to major international events, and acted as a special correspondent at prestigious races including Paris-Roubaix, the Tour de France, and the Vuelta a España.
Juan’s combination of experience, expertise, and direct access to athletes has established him—and the platforms he leads—as authoritative voices in professional cycling.
claps 5visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
- OFF TOPIC: OK, don't get mad with me... I have some very important news, something that can't be overlooked, something that can't be ignored!!! In the new documentary Anatomy of a G.O.A.T. (released in November 2026), legendary Belgian cyclist EDDY MERCKX spoke about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: Now, this is real important cycling news. This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not BS history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone. pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed. somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw. lol. you are a tool.mij09-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments











