The second round of the Canadian classics on the 15th of September will see the riders head to Montréal, where a circuit around the Mont-Royal will decide the race. We preview the race.
A total of 18 laps will be ridden in Montréal, all based around the Mont-Royal park, where the riders will spend the afternoon, however not only enjoying the scenery, but also having to go into a brutal race that will see plenty attacks and aggressive racing. There are over 4000 meters of climbing and 213 kilometers on the menu, making it harder and longer than Québec. There will also be more laps due to the shorter circuit, which is very explosive with three clear uphill sections and the rest of the circuit mostly downhill. The lap opens up immediately with it’s major feature, the Côte de Camilien-Houde, 1.7 kilometers at 7.6%. This will be the hardest section of the circuit and likely the one that will be attacked the hardest, finishing with 10.5 kilometers to go.
Read also

Montréal - Montréal, 213.5 kilometers
A very fast descent follows, with the Côte de Polytechnique coming after summiting with 6 kilometers to go, it is 800 meters long at 4.9% average gradient but goes up to 10%. And with 3 kilometers will be the Côte Pognuelo with 500 meters at 7.5%.
All three are very explosive climbs, where damage can be made. The riders will then very quickly travel back into the Avenue where the race is to finishing, going down it before turning back in the roundabout and within sight of the line. This won’t be a regular sprint however, with the final 600 meters featuring 4% of gradient which can alter the result of the sprints that will happen.
Read also

GP de Montréal circuit


Map GP de Montréal 2024
Hot temperatures, not far from 30 degrees, and a slight southern breeze that shouldn't be strong enough to really affect the race.
Read also
The Favourites
Tadej Pogacar - Last year UAE made it a hard race and then attacked with Adam Yates on the final climb. A pure climber, and he still made the difference... So it is absolutely possible to make this a race suited even to the non-explosive riders. But Pogacar IS explosive as well so even if he can't drop everyone on the main climb of the circuit he stands a good chance of winning. But UAE will certainly push the pace as they did in Québec (only now with more damage) as they perfectly implemented the strategy last year and have the riders to do serious damage here, with Tim Wellens, Finn Fisher-Black and Juan Ayuso being just two examples. I expect a solo win, but a few riders may be able to match him as he doesn't yet look to be in his peak form.
Visma - Visma have several strong riders to pay attention to. Per Strand Hagenes was better suited to Québec but is a bit wildcard here; Jan Tratnik and Wilco Kelderman are riders who may want to attack the race early on whilst both Tiesj Benoot and Matteo Jorgenson looked incredibly strong on Friday and on this type of climb I think they can ride brilliantly and fight for the win.
Climbers - If the riders go hard all day long or UAE makes serious bids than the climbers can certainly benefit from it. Riders such as Bahrain's Pello Bilbao and Santiago Buitrago, Jayco's Simon Yates, Cofidis' Ion Izagirre, DSM's Romain Bardet, INEOS' Laurens de Plus and Alex Baudin of Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale.
Read also
Classics Riders - As was the case in Québec, the bulk of contenders for a result are puncheurs and classics riders, many of them preparing for the World Championships. Particular attention must be in Lotto Dstny with Jenno Berckmoes but particularly Maxim van Gils who look to be in great form after their exhibition in Québec. The likes of Bauke Mollema, Edoardo Zambanini and Rudy Molard also look in tip top conditions and are riders to consider that I wouldn't initially put on the table.
Within these, there are a few riders that would wish for a hard race from far away such as Aurélien Paret-Peintre, Tobias Johannessen, Valentin Madouas and EF duo Neilson Powless and Ben Healy who are specialists in the long races. 'Home' team Israel - Premier Tech have serious chances of fighting for top results... Derek Gee is a card but isn't seemingly in good form, but the same can't be said of Stephen Williams who is in great form after his Tour of Britain win and national champion Michael Woods just off a Vuelta a España victory, extremely motivated and well suited to this race.
Others will want a more punchy race such as Magnus Sheffield, Matej Mohoric, Toms Skujins, Max Schachmann, Alberto Bettiol, Julian Alaphilippe, Romain Grégoire and Alex Aranburu. More explosive and pure puncheurs, they can do better if the race comes down to only a few efforts.
A few fast men may also chances of fighting for a strong result, but I wouldn't say victory. Arnaud De Lie is looking stupendous and I think he can do well, but this race is too much for the climbers for him to thrive... Still I wouldn't discard him, but he won't have the team working for him as was the case on Friday. We've got Michael Matthews, who if the race is not overly hard can certainly survive and be a threat in a sprint; and perhaps riders such as Biniam Girmay and Axel Laurance can be considered as outsiders if they are on a great day.
Read also
Prediction GP de Montréal 2024:
*** Tadej Pogacar
** Matteo Jorgenson, Tiesj Benoot, Maxim van Gils, Stephen Williams
* Pello Bilbao, Santiago Buitrago, Ion Izagirre, Jenno Berckmoes, Arnaud De Lie, Michael Matthews, Valentin Madouas, Ben Healy, Neilson Powless, Michael Woods, Toms Skujins, Julian Alaphilippe, Alberto Bettiol, Alex Aranburu
** Matteo Jorgenson, Tiesj Benoot, Maxim van Gils, Stephen Williams
* Pello Bilbao, Santiago Buitrago, Ion Izagirre, Jenno Berckmoes, Arnaud De Lie, Michael Matthews, Valentin Madouas, Ben Healy, Neilson Powless, Michael Woods, Toms Skujins, Julian Alaphilippe, Alberto Bettiol, Alex Aranburu
Pick: Tadej Pogacar
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment










