DISCUSSION Tour de France Stage 9 | Is UAE in danger without Almeida? Is Merlier the best sprinter this year?
Cycling
Stage 9 of the Tour de France was a perfect
opportunity for sprinters. The day presented no difficulties, as no climbs were
on the menu today. However, the peloton had to be on alert, as crosswinds were
expected during the whole stage.
This time, it was Alpecin who animated the
stage from the gun. Van der Poel and Jonas Rickaert launched an audacious move
early on, challenging the peloton in a long-range battle that lasted more than
170 kilometers.
Few people believed that the Alpecin duo could
withstand the pressure from the peloton and secure a victory in the stage.
However, they fought side by side until the very end. Unfortunately for them,
Mathieu van der Poel had to surrender with just 500 meters remaining.
The sprint finish was chaotic, but Tim Merlier
was able to redeem himself and narrowly beat Jonathan Milan, after not being able
to sprint yesterday due to an inopportune puncture.
The sad news was Joao Almeida withdrawing from
the race. The Portuguese rider was not able to continue as a result of a hard
crash he suffered during stage 7, which caused him a rib fracture.
Once the stage finished, we asked some of our
writers to share their thoughts and main takeaways about what happened today.
Read also
Carlos Silva (CiclismoAtual)
Yesterday I wrote in this column that for me Jonathan Milan won but didn't convince. That he'd won the stage but wasn't the best sprinter in the Tour de France. I wrote that he wouldn't win today and ... didn't win the stage. Milan is a powerhouse, he's young, he's in a good team. But he has a way of sprinting that I don't admire. I find him clumsy on the bike.
Negative news of the day in the race: João Almeida's withdrawal. It was only a matter of time. He's human, and after a fall like that, no matter how much he wanted to help Pogacar in the mountains, it was impossible. I wish him a speedy recovery and a strong comeback for the Vuelta.
Mathieu van der Poel gave a lesson in companionship and showed what it means to be a team leader. Rickaert had a dream... which is now a reality. Visma once again wanted to put pressure on the peloton and proved that they are a team cut out for the crosswinds.
Although this may have cost Wout van Aert the chance to contest the sprint at the end of the day. But as the Belgian said yesterday, if he had any intention of going for the sprint, he'd first write something on Twitter to warn his rivals... I went to Twitter and he didn't write anything, so I guess he didn't have any thoughts of being there for the sprint. Now come the mountains please, I'm sick of flat stages.
Read also
Félix Serna (CyclingUpToDate)
Almeida's absence completely changes the
dynamics of the race.
We've seen a very focused Visma team so far, committed to a clear strategy: to
animate the race every single day, regardless of the terrain. Now, with the
high mountains approaching in the second week, UAE can hardly afford to be
without Almeida. His absence is a major blow to their tactical depth.
Visma, on the other hand, should now enjoy a
tactical edge. With one of the strongest support riders like Jorgenson, they
have the tools to put pressure on UAE. That said, when your rival is Tadej
Pogacar, any “advantage” must be taken with a grain of salt. If anything,
Almeida’s withdrawal might simply bring the balance of power closer to even, no
more, no less.
When looking at the stage’s profile, I was
confident that we would not see any breakaway once again. I am glad I was
wrong. The Alpecin team put on a masterclass in how to keep spectators engaged
for a couple of hours.
Tactical-wise, I am not sure what the goal
behind that move was. Yes, Mathieu van der Poel said in an interview that the
team wanted to help Jonas Rickaert to fulfill his dream: being on the podium of
the Tour de France. But perhaps you don’t need to squeeze Van der Poel to
achieve that. Rickaert won the combative award, but he would have won it anyway
if he had gone solo from the beginning.
The sprint finish was chaotic, but it allowed
us to draw several conclusions. After a rough start of the season, Arnaud de
Lie is back. He obtained back-to-back top 5 finishes in sprints, today being third.
Jonathan Milan was second, but he has not beaten
Tim Merlier in head-to-head sprints yet in this Tour. The Italian looked unbeatable
at the beginning of the season, and honestly, I was expecting something more
from him.
Wout van Aert publicly announced on social
media that he was going to contest today’s sprint, but in the end, he didn’t. The Belgian seems to be playing a bit of a
cat-and-mouse game in this Tour. It’s hard to predict exactly what he’ll do on
any given stage.
Perhaps that unpredictability is part of
Visma’s strategy to keep their rivals guessing. However, so far, it doesn’t
seem to be having much of an impact on Pogacar.
And you? What are your thoughts about what
happened today? Leave a comment and join the discussion!

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 15visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- You can clearly see the the posture change from slightly sitting to again out of the saddle while changing of gears in the video of the sprintabstractengineer08-11-2026
- He has already beaten Pogi twice in the TDF. the achievement is over. He cannot beat Pogi now and he only has a few years left at the top. Win Giro and compete in the TDF, maximise palmares.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- I think that they're not really used to dealing with this type of incident in a cyclocross race, and the situation has been magnified because it was a race for a championship title. It's very unfortunate that the race had to be decided in this way.
santiagobenites07-11-2026 - Seriously why do they keep doing stupid things like this. Its one thing to relegate when the placings are minor, when the action is blatant. But when it is ambiguous, why dont they at least take advice from some higher up to avoid embarrassing themselves. This is similar to the Halland goal when his teammate was clearly offside and interfered in play and VAR gave them the goal. if you dont have evidence you cannot convict. Even for doping they have these rulesabstractengineer07-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







